
A comedic short film that follows a man who, before going to bed, carefully hides his valuable possessions under his mattress for safekeeping. Unbeknownst to him, two clever burglars have already positioned themselves on his roof, planning their heist. The burglars use various comical methods to enter the house while the man sleeps soundly, believing his treasures are secure. The film builds tension through the dramatic irony of the situation, as the audience watches the thieves work while the homeowner remains completely oblivious. The situation culminates in a humorous confrontation when the man finally awakens to discover his valuables missing and the intruders still present.

Filmed during the early days of cinema when most productions were simple one-reeler shorts. The film was likely shot on a basic indoor set with minimal lighting equipment. As with many films of this era, it was probably shot in a single day with a small crew. The roof scenes would have been created using stage construction and painted backdrops, a common practice in early cinema.
1904 was a pivotal year in cinema's development, occurring just nine years after the Lumière brothers' first public screening. This period saw the transition from simple actualities to narrative storytelling. France, particularly through Pathé, dominated the global film market. The film emerged during the Belle Époque, a time of cultural flourishing in France. Cinema was still primarily a novelty attraction, shown in fairgrounds, music halls, and temporary venues. The comedy-crime genre reflected contemporary urban anxieties about security and property in rapidly growing cities. This was also the year before the nickelodeon boom would transform film exhibition in America.
While not a groundbreaking masterpiece, 'Burglary at Night' represents an important step in the development of cinematic comedy and narrative structure. It demonstrates early filmmakers' growing confidence in creating fictional scenarios rather than merely documenting reality. The film's use of dramatic irony shows an advanced understanding of cinematic storytelling techniques for its time. It contributed to the establishment of comedy as a viable commercial genre in early cinema. The film also reflects the urban middle-class lifestyle and concerns of early 20th century France, providing a cultural snapshot of the period.
Gaston Velle, who began his career as a stage magician, brought his expertise in illusion to filmmaking. The production would have utilized primitive camera equipment mounted on tripods, with natural light supplemented by arc lamps. The actors were likely stage performers adapting to the new medium of cinema. The roof scenes required careful set construction to create the illusion of height while maintaining safety for the performers. The film was probably shot in sequence, as editing was still in its infancy. The mattress gag required precise timing to achieve maximum comedic effect, and the burglars' movements would have been choreographed to create visual interest within the static camera shots typical of the era.
The cinematography would have been rudimentary by modern standards, featuring static camera positions typical of early cinema. The film likely used medium shots to capture the actors' movements and expressions. Lighting would have been basic, utilizing available studio illumination. The visual composition would have been theatrical, with actors positioned for maximum visibility within the frame. Any special effects, such as the burglars' entrance, would have been achieved through practical means rather than camera tricks.
While not technically innovative, the film demonstrates competent use of then-current filmmaking techniques. The set construction for the roof scenes shows early mastery of creating convincing illusions within studio constraints. The film's editing, though minimal by modern standards, represents the growing understanding of narrative pacing in cinema. The use of multiple interconnected scenes shows advancement beyond the single-shot films common just a few years earlier.
As a silent film, it had no recorded soundtrack. In exhibition, it would have been accompanied by live music, typically a pianist or small ensemble in dedicated cinemas, or possibly a phonograph recording in smaller venues. The musical accompaniment would have been improvised or selected from standard repertoire to match the film's comedic and suspenseful moments. The music would have helped guide audience emotions and enhance the timing of the visual gags.
Contemporary critical reception is difficult to document as film criticism was still in its infancy in 1904. Trade publications of the era likely mentioned it in passing as part of Pathé's regular output. Modern film historians view it as a typical but competent example of early French comedy, demonstrating the developing language of cinematic narrative. It's valued today more for its historical significance than for its artistic merits, representing an important stage in the evolution of comedy cinema.
Audiences in 1904 would have found the film entertaining and novel, as any moving picture was still a marvel to most viewers. The simple, visual humor would have been easily understood across language barriers, contributing to its potential international appeal. The familiar scenario of burglary combined with comedy would have resonated with urban audiences experiencing similar security concerns. The film's short length made it ideal for the mixed programs typical of early cinema exhibitions.
The preservation status is unclear, as many films from this era have been lost. If prints survive, they would likely be held in film archives such as the Cinémathèque Française or the Library of Congress. Any surviving copies would probably be on nitrate film stock requiring careful conservation. The film may exist in fragmentary form or as part of compilation reels of early Pathé productions.