Keeping Up with the Joneses: Women's Styles

Plot

In this domestic comedy from the early silent era, the McGinis family finds themselves at odds over the latest fashion trends. Aloysius McGinis, the traditional patriarch, is horrified when his wife Clarice and daughter Julie return home sporting the newest, most extravagant women's styles of 1915. The family's housemaid Belladonna also gets caught up in the fashion frenzy, further infuriating the cost-conscious Pa. The film uses animated sequences to visualize the increasingly elaborate and expensive dresses, creating a humorous contrast between the women's fashion enthusiasm and Aloysius's growing frustration. The comedy escalates as the women's shopping sprees threaten to bankrupt the household, leading to a series of comedic confrontations and eventual resolution.

Historical Background

The film was produced during a pivotal period in American history, as the country experienced rapid industrialization, urbanization, and the rise of consumer culture. 1915 marked the height of the Progressive Era, with social reform movements challenging traditional values and roles. The women's suffrage movement was gaining momentum, and changing gender roles were reflected in fashion trends that allowed for greater freedom of movement. The film's theme of fashion-driven consumerism spoke directly to the growing American middle class, who were increasingly participating in consumer culture and social competition. This was also a time of significant technological advancement in cinema, with studios experimenting with new techniques like animation, color tinting, and more sophisticated camera work. The film was released just before America's entry into World War I, which would dramatically alter fashion trends and social priorities.

Making Of

The production of 'Keeping Up with the Joneses: Women's Styles' represented Vitagraph's attempt to capitalize on both the popularity of domestic comedies and the growing fascination with animation technology. Director Harry Palmer worked closely with Vitagraph's animation department to create the sequences that visualized the increasingly elaborate dresses. The live-action portions were filmed on Vitagraph's Brooklyn studio sets, which included detailed recreations of middle-class American homes. The cast, largely composed of Vitagraph stock players, had to adapt to the technical requirements of working with animation elements, often performing to empty spaces where animated characters would later be inserted. The film's production schedule was typical for the era, with shooting completed in just 2-3 days, followed by several weeks of animation work. The costume department sourced actual 1915 fashion pieces to ensure authenticity, working with local dressmakers to acquire the latest styles.

Visual Style

The cinematography was typical of Vitagraph productions in 1915, utilizing stationary cameras with basic movement techniques. The film employed standard shot-reverse-shot patterns for dialogue scenes and wider shots for establishing the domestic setting. The animated sequences required special matte work to combine the live-action and animated elements. The cinematographer had to carefully plan shots to allow for the later insertion of animated elements, often leaving specific areas of the frame empty for this purpose. The film used natural lighting supplemented by studio lighting equipment, creating the bright, clear look typical of comedies of this era.

Innovations

The film's most notable technical achievement was its early use of hybrid animation, combining live-action footage with animated cut-out sequences. This required sophisticated matte photography techniques for the time. The animation itself used cut-out paper figures moved frame by frame, a labor-intensive process that was still experimental in 1915. The film also demonstrated Vitagraph's growing expertise in creating convincing domestic sets that could be quickly assembled and modified for different scenes. The seamless integration of animation and live-action was considered technically impressive for its period.

Music

This was a silent film and would have been accompanied by live musical performance in theaters. Typical accompaniment would have included a pianist or small orchestra playing popular songs of 1915, classical pieces, and original mood music. The score would have emphasized the comedic moments with lively ragtime tunes and used more dramatic music for the fashion sequences. No original composed score was created specifically for this film.

Memorable Scenes

• The animated sequence showing the dresses growing increasingly elaborate and expensive, with price tags spiraling upward
• The confrontation scene where Pa discovers the mounting clothing bills and confronts the women of the household
• The fashion show sequence where the women model their new purchases, each more extravagant than the last
• The final reconciliation scene where the family reaches a compromise about fashion spending

What Critics Said

Contemporary reviews in trade publications like The Moving Picture World and Variety noted the film's clever use of animation to visualize fashion excess. Critics praised the film's timely social commentary on consumer culture and its effective combination of humor and social observation. The performances of the Vitagraph stock company were generally well-received, with particular mention of the comedic timing in the domestic scenes. Modern film historians recognize the film as an interesting example of early hybrid animation and as a document of Progressive Era social attitudes. However, like many short comedies of the period, it was primarily seen as entertainment rather than art, and critical analysis was limited to its commercial appeal rather than its artistic merits.

What Audiences Thought

The film appears to have been popular with contemporary audiences, as evidenced by Vitagraph's continuation of the 'Keeping Up with the Joneses' series. Middle-class audiences particularly related to the domestic situations and fashion themes. The combination of live-action comedy with animated sequences was considered novel and entertaining. The film's humor resonated with viewers who were experiencing similar pressures to keep up with changing fashion trends and social expectations. Audience feedback, as reported in trade papers, suggested that the film's depiction of family dynamics over fashion expenses struck a familiar chord with many viewers of the time.

You Might Also Like