Short Subject

Plot

This provocative underground animated short follows Mickey Mouse as he enthusiastically enlists in the U.S. Army during the Vietnam War. After basic training, the iconic Disney character ships off to Vietnam with patriotic zeal, only to encounter the brutal realities of combat. The film depicts Mickey's journey from naive recruit to disillusioned soldier, experiencing jungle warfare, witnessing atrocities, and ultimately facing the psychological toll of war. The animation culminates in a powerful anti-war statement as Mickey returns home transformed and traumatized by his experiences. The short uses the familiar Disney character to subvert American propaganda and critique the Vietnam War.

Historical Background

Created in 1969 during one of the most turbulent years of the Vietnam War, this film emerged when anti-war sentiment was at its peak in America. 1969 saw massive protests across the country, the Moratorium to End the War in Vietnam demonstrations, and the publication of the Pentagon Papers. The film reflected growing disillusionment with the war effort and criticism of how mainstream media, including Disney cartoons, often presented sanitized versions of American values. The unauthorized use of Mickey Mouse symbolized the counter-culture's rejection of corporate America and its values. This period also saw the rise of underground cinema as a form of political expression, with this short being a prime example of how animation could be used for protest rather than entertainment.

Making Of

Lee Savage, coming from a family of animators, created this subversive short as a direct response to the Vietnam War and American media's portrayal of it. The production was done in secret to avoid Disney's legal team, using a small team of underground animators who shared Savage's anti-war sentiments. The decision to use Mickey Mouse was deliberate - as America's most beloved cartoon character, his involvement in the horrors of Vietnam created maximum shock value. The animation was intentionally rough and unpolished to contrast with Disney's pristine productions, emphasizing the ugliness of war. The film was completed in 1969, during the peak of American involvement in Vietnam, and was immediately embraced by the counter-culture movement as a powerful piece of protest art.

Visual Style

The film uses traditional cel animation techniques but deliberately employs a rough, unfinished aesthetic that contrasts sharply with Disney's polished style. The color palette is muted and dark, using grays, browns, and deep reds to evoke the grim reality of war. The animation is intentionally jerky and crude in places, emphasizing the chaos and violence of combat. Visual techniques include rapid cuts between Mickey's cheerful demeanor and brutal war scenes, creating cognitive dissonance. The film occasionally uses mock propaganda-style imagery before subverting it with graphic content. The animation style evolves throughout the short, becoming increasingly fragmented and abstract as Mickey experiences trauma, visually representing psychological breakdown.

Innovations

While not technically innovative in terms of animation techniques, the film was groundbreaking in its use of copyrighted characters for political commentary. The production demonstrated how limited resources could be used effectively to create powerful political statements. The filmmakers managed to create a convincing Disney-style animation despite working outside the studio system. The film's preservation and restoration over the years has been notable, given its underground origins and the limited number of original prints. It represents an early example of what would later be called 'culture jamming' - using corporate imagery against itself. The technical execution, while crude by studio standards, effectively serves the film's subversive purpose.

Music

The film uses a minimalist sound design with limited dialogue, relying primarily on ambient sounds and occasional patriotic music that becomes increasingly ironic as the narrative progresses. The soundtrack includes distorted versions of American patriotic songs, military marches, and the sounds of jungle warfare. Mickey's familiar high-pitched voice is used sparingly, making his occasional dialogue more impactful. The audio design emphasizes the contrast between the cartoon's typically cheerful sound effects and the grim reality of war. Gunfire, explosions, and screams are mixed with incongruously cheerful music, creating a disturbing auditory experience. The sound quality reflects its underground production origins, with a raw, unpolished aesthetic that matches the visual style.

Memorable Scenes

• Mickey Mouse happily signing his enlistment papers with patriotic music playing
• The jarring transition from basic training to jungle combat
• Mickey's expression changing from enthusiasm to horror as he witnesses war atrocities
• The final scene showing a broken, traumatized Mickey returning home
• The subversion of Disney's 'happily ever after' trope with a grim ending

What Critics Said

At the time of its release, mainstream critics largely ignored the film due to its underground nature and limited distribution. However, within counter-culture and alternative press circles, it was praised as a brilliant and daring piece of political satire. Film scholars and critics later recognized it as an important work of protest animation. Contemporary critics view it as a historically significant artifact that effectively captured the anti-war sentiment of its era. The film is now appreciated for its boldness in using a beloved character to critique American foreign policy, though some modern viewers find the imagery disturbing. It's often cited in discussions about political animation and the use of copyrighted characters in subversive art.

What Audiences Thought

The film was enthusiastically received by anti-war activists and college students when it was screened at protests and campus events. Many viewers found the juxtaposition of Mickey Mouse with Vietnam War imagery shocking and effective in conveying the horrors of war. The underground film circuit embraced it as a powerful statement against American involvement in Vietnam. Some viewers, particularly those who had grown up with Disney cartoons, found the subversion deeply unsettling, which was precisely the filmmaker's intent. The film circulated primarily through word of mouth and was considered a 'must-see' among counter-culture circles. Its rarity and controversial nature added to its mystique and impact on audiences who managed to see it.

You Might Also Like