The Miser

Plot

The Miser follows the story of an elderly wealthy man who hoards his money and refuses to help anyone in need, regardless of their circumstances. The film opens with several scenes showing the miser turning away desperate people who come to him for financial assistance, demonstrating his extreme selfishness and greed. After missing portions of the film, the surviving fragment picks up later in the narrative when the miser discovers his money has been stolen, sending him into a state of panic and despair. The old man frantically searches his home, growing increasingly frantic as he realizes his entire fortune has vanished, ultimately leading to his emotional breakdown. The fragment ends with the miser in a state of complete devastation, having lost the wealth he valued more than human compassion or connection.

Historical Background

The Miser was produced in 1908, a pivotal year in early cinema history. This period marked the transition from short novelty films to longer narrative features, and Georges Méliès was struggling to adapt his theatrical style to these changing demands. The film emerged during the height of the Belle Époque in France, a time of great artistic innovation but also growing social tensions about wealth inequality. Industrialization was creating new fortunes while many lived in poverty, making stories about misers particularly relevant to contemporary audiences. The cinema industry was rapidly professionalizing, with larger studios like Pathé and Gaumont dominating the market, making it difficult for independent producers like Méliès to compete. 1908 also saw the rise of film d'art in France, which emphasized literary adaptations and more sophisticated storytelling, putting pressure on filmmakers like Méliès to evolve beyond his fantasy spectacles. The film's themes of greed and redemption resonated with Edwardian moral values while also reflecting anxieties about capitalism in an increasingly industrialized world.

Making Of

The Miser was produced during a challenging period in Georges Méliès's career. By 1908, the filmmaker was facing increasing competition from other studios and changing audience preferences. His glass studio in Montreuil-sous-Bois, where he had created his most famous works, was still operational but the financial strain was mounting. The film was created using Méliès's meticulous theatrical approach, with actors performing on painted sets that created the illusion of three-dimensional space. The special effects were achieved in-camera using techniques Méliès had pioneered, including multiple exposures and substitution splices. The production likely involved Méliès's regular troupe of actors who had appeared in many of his previous films. The hand-coloring process, if used for this film, would have been done by women workers at the studio using painstaking frame-by-frame techniques. The fragmented state of the surviving print suggests the film may have been stored poorly or damaged during the decades when Méliès's work was largely forgotten before his rediscovery in the mid-20th century.

Visual Style

The cinematography in The Miser reflects Georges Méliès's signature theatrical style, using static camera positions typical of early cinema. The film was shot using Méliès's custom cameras and likely employed multiple exposure techniques for special effects. The visual composition follows theatrical conventions with actors positioned to face the camera, creating the illusion of a stage performance. The lighting would have been natural sunlight from the glass roof of Méliès's studio, creating the bright, even illumination characteristic of his films. The surviving fragment shows careful attention to set design and props, with detailed interiors that create the illusion of the miser's wealthy but isolated home. The camera work, while static by modern standards, was sophisticated for its time, with deliberate framing that guides the viewer's attention to key narrative elements.

Innovations

The Miser demonstrates Georges Méliès's continued innovation in special effects and filmmaking techniques, even in his later period. The film likely employed substitution splices for the appearance and disappearance of money and other magical elements. The set design showcases Méliès's mastery of creating detailed theatrical environments that photographed well, using perspective tricks and painted backdrops to create depth. The production may have featured dissolves or fade transitions between scenes, techniques Méliès helped pioneer. The hand-coloring process, if used for certain prints, represented a significant technical achievement requiring meticulous frame-by-frame work. The film's special effects, while simpler than Méliès's earlier fantasy spectacles, still demonstrate his understanding of in-camera tricks and visual storytelling techniques that were ahead of their time.

Music

As a silent film from 1908, The Miser would have been accompanied by live music during theatrical screenings. The specific musical score is not documented, but it likely included popular pieces of the era selected by theater musicians to match the film's dramatic tone. The music would have varied depending on the venue, with larger theaters employing orchestras while smaller venues used piano or organ accompaniment. The emotional arc of the story - from the miser's cruelty to his panic and despair - would have been enhanced through carefully chosen musical selections that emphasized the moral themes of the narrative. Modern screenings of the surviving fragment typically use period-appropriate classical music or newly composed scores that reflect the film's dramatic content.

Memorable Scenes

• The opening sequence showing the miser turning away desperate people seeking help
• The frantic search for the stolen money, showing the miser's growing panic
• The final scene of the miser's emotional breakdown upon realizing his fortune is gone

What Critics Said

Contemporary critical reception of The Miser is difficult to assess due to the limited survival of film reviews from 1908. However, Méliès's works during this period generally received mixed reviews as audiences and critics began to favor more realistic storytelling over his theatrical fantasy style. Modern film historians and critics view the surviving fragment with interest primarily for its historical value rather than its artistic merits. The film is often discussed in the context of Méliès's declining career and the changing tastes of early cinema audiences. Critics today note that while the film may not represent Méliès at his creative peak, it still demonstrates his technical proficiency and storytelling abilities. The fragmented nature of the surviving print makes complete critical assessment challenging, though scholars generally agree that it represents an important example of Méliès's dramatic work.

What Audiences Thought

Audience reception of The Miser in 1908 is not well documented, but it likely reflected the general decline in popularity that Méliès was experiencing during this period. Early cinema audiences were beginning to prefer more realistic narratives and location filming over the theatrical studio productions that characterized Méliès's work. The moral tale of the miser would have been familiar to contemporary audiences through theatrical traditions and literature, potentially making the story accessible despite the language barriers of silent cinema. Modern audiences who have seen the surviving fragment often view it with historical interest, appreciating it as an example of early narrative cinema and Méliès's evolving style. The film's incomplete state makes it difficult for contemporary viewers to fully appreciate, but it remains of interest to cinema enthusiasts and scholars of early film.

You Might Also Like