After the Ball

Plot

In this groundbreaking one-minute film, a well-dressed woman arrives home after attending a grand ball. Her faithful maid assists her in removing her elaborate evening gown, corset, and other layers of clothing. The woman then prepares to take a bath, and in a daring scene for 1897, she removes her final garment and steps into the tub, briefly revealing her nude form from behind. The film concludes with the woman bathing while her maid attends to her, creating what was considered a scandalous yet artistically significant tableau for early cinema audiences.

Historical Background

This film was created during the very dawn of cinema, just two years after the Lumière brothers' first public screening in 1895. The late 1890s was a period of rapid experimentation with the new medium of motion pictures. France was the center of early film innovation, with pioneers like the Lumières, Méliès, and others competing to push the boundaries of what cinema could show. The Belle Époque era (1871-1914) was characterized by artistic innovation and changing social mores, though Victorian-era morality still dominated public discourse. This film emerged at a time when society was grappling with new technologies and their impact on art and morality.

Making Of

Georges Méliès, a former magician and theater owner, applied his theatrical expertise to this early film. The production was staged with the precision of a magic trick, with careful choreography between the two actresses. The film was shot in a single continuous take, requiring perfect timing from both performers. Méliès used his garden as an outdoor studio, taking advantage of natural lighting. The controversial nature of the nude scene meant Méliès had to be careful about how the film was marketed and distributed, often presenting it as an artistic study rather than sensational content. The hand-coloring process, when used, was done by women workers in Méliès's workshop who applied colors directly to the film frames using tiny brushes.

Visual Style

The film was shot using a single stationary camera, typical of early cinema. The composition was carefully staged like a theatrical tableau, with the actors positioned for maximum visual impact. The natural lighting from outdoor filming created a soft, diffused quality that enhanced the intimate nature of the scene. In hand-colored versions, subtle tints were added to the costumes and scenery, creating a more visually rich experience. The camera work was straightforward but effective, capturing the entire sequence in one continuous take that emphasized the theatrical origins of the production.

Innovations

While not technically innovative compared to Méliès's later fantasy films, 'After the Ball' demonstrated several important early film techniques. The single continuous take required precise timing and coordination between actors. The use of natural outdoor lighting was sophisticated for its time. The hand-coloring process, when employed, was labor-intensive and represented an early attempt to add color to motion pictures. The film also showed early understanding of narrative structure and pacing, telling a complete story in just one minute.

Music

As a silent film, it had no synchronized soundtrack. When originally shown, it would have been accompanied by live music, typically a pianist or small orchestra playing popular tunes of the era or classical pieces appropriate to the mood. Some venues may have used specific musical selections suggested by Méliès's distribution materials. The music would have been chosen to enhance the intimate, slightly scandalous nature of the proceedings.

Memorable Scenes

• The controversial moment when the woman removes her final garment and steps into the bath, revealing her nude form from behind - a scene that shocked and fascinated 1897 audiences and marked one of cinema's first instances of nudity

What Critics Said

Contemporary critics were divided on the film. Some praised its artistic merit and technical execution, while others condemned it as immoral and inappropriate for public viewing. Film trade journals of the era noted its commercial success despite the controversy. Modern critics and film historians recognize it as an important early work that pushed boundaries and demonstrated cinema's potential as an art form. It's now studied as an example of early narrative cinema and the beginning of film censorship debates.

What Audiences Thought

The film was enormously popular with audiences, particularly in more liberal European cities. Its scandalous nature actually increased its appeal, with many viewers specifically seeking it out. In more conservative areas, it was often shown in restricted screenings or not at all. The brief nudity, while shocking to Victorian-era sensibilities, was generally accepted as artistic rather than pornographic by most viewers of the time. The film's success demonstrated that early cinema audiences were sophisticated enough to appreciate artistic nudity within a narrative context.

You Might Also Like