
"The smallest enemy can cause the biggest trouble on a wedding night"
On his wedding night, Max Linder's character eagerly anticipates his first night with his beautiful new bride Stacia Napierkowska. As the couple settles into their bedroom for what should be a romantic evening, Max becomes increasingly agitated by a persistent flea that keeps biting him. The comedy escalates as Max's attempts to catch and eliminate the tiny pest grow more frantic and elaborate, disrupting the romantic atmosphere and frustrating his new wife. Max's desperate battle against the invisible enemy leads to increasingly absurd situations, from tearing apart the bedding to creating elaborate traps. The film culminates in chaos as the newlywed couple's romantic evening is completely derailed by Max's obsessive war against the single flea.

This film was part of Max Linder's highly successful series of comedy shorts for Pathé Frères. The production utilized the simple but effective comedy formula Linder was known for: taking a common situation (wedding night) and introducing an escalating problem (the flea). The film showcases Linder's trademark sophisticated comedy style, relying on physical humor but with a more refined approach than many contemporaries. The flea itself was never shown on screen, with all comedy derived from Max's reactions and increasingly frantic movements.
1912 was a pivotal year in cinema's development, occurring during the transition from early film experimentation to more sophisticated narrative storytelling. The film industry was rapidly expanding globally, with French studios like Pathé Frères dominating international markets. Max Linder was at this time arguably the world's biggest film star, with an international following that rivaled later Hollywood icons. This period saw the rise of feature-length films, but comedy shorts remained extremely popular. The film was made just before World War I would dramatically reshape European cinema. In 1912, film censorship was becoming more organized, so filmmakers had to be creative with suggestive themes like wedding nights. The technical aspects of filmmaking were evolving rapidly, with better lighting, more stable cameras, and improved film stock allowing for more sophisticated visual comedy.
This film represents an important example of early sophisticated comedy that moved beyond simple slapstick. Max Linder's approach influenced an entire generation of comedians and helped establish the comedy short as a legitimate art form. The film's success demonstrated that international audiences could appreciate subtle comedy and character-driven humor, not just physical gags. Linder's 'Max' character - a dapper gentleman facing absurd situations - became an archetype for screen comedy. The film also represents the peak of French dominance in international cinema before World War I. Its treatment of adult themes with comedic discretion showed how filmmakers could navigate censorship while still entertaining adult audiences. The film's international success helped establish the global nature of cinema as an entertainment medium.
Max Linder was at the height of his creative powers when he made this film, having complete creative control over his productions at Pathé. The film showcases Linder's methodical approach to comedy - he would spend considerable time planning each gag and its escalation. The bedroom set was typical of Pathé's production values - detailed and realistic for the period. Linder worked closely with his directors (though he often functioned as his own director) to perfect the timing of each comedic beat. The film's success led to several similar 'disrupted evening' shorts in his filmography. Stacia Napierkowska, though primarily known as a dramatic actress, demonstrated good comic timing opposite Linder. The production team used innovative camera techniques for the time, including close-ups to emphasize Linder's reactions to the unseen flea.
The cinematography, typical of Pathé productions of this era, was sophisticated for its time. The film uses medium shots effectively to capture Linder's full physical performance while maintaining the bedroom setting's intimacy. The lighting creates a romantic atmosphere that contrasts humorously with the chaotic action. Camera work is static, as was standard for the period, but the framing is carefully composed to maximize the comedic effect. The film occasionally uses closer framing than was typical for 1912 to emphasize Linder's facial expressions and reactions to the unseen flea. Some prints featured Pathé's stencil coloring process, adding subtle color tints to enhance the mood of certain scenes.
While not technically groundbreaking, the film demonstrated mastery of existing film techniques for comedy. The production utilized Pathé's advanced film stock, which allowed for clearer images than many competitors. The film's pacing and editing were sophisticated for 1912, with careful attention to comic timing. The unseen flea concept required precise performance and direction to maintain the illusion. Some versions of the film featured Pathé's innovative stencil coloring system, one of the earliest methods of adding color to motion pictures. The film also demonstrated effective use of continuity editing to maintain narrative flow within the single setting.
As a silent film, 'An Agitated Night' would have been accompanied by live musical performance during theatrical exhibition. The typical score would have been light and comedic, with musical cues punctuating the action. For the romantic opening, softer, more romantic music would have been played, transitioning to more frantic, comedic music as Max's battle with the flea escalated. The music would have been provided by whatever musicians the individual theater employed, ranging from solo piano to small orchestras. No specific composed score survives, but contemporary accounts suggest that lively, popular tunes of the era were often incorporated into the accompaniment.
(Silent film - no dialogue, but Linder's expressive gestures and reactions became iconic comedic moments)
The film's title itself became a catchphrase for describing frustrating nights
Contemporary critics praised the film for its clever premise and Linder's masterful performance. Trade publications of the era, such as Moving Picture World, noted the film's 'delicious comedy' and 'perfect timing'. Critics particularly appreciated how Linder could generate humor from an unseen antagonist (the flea) purely through physical performance. The film was often cited as an example of 'refined' comedy suitable for all audiences. Modern film historians view it as an excellent example of Linder's sophisticated comedy style and its influence on later comedians. The film is frequently studied in film courses as an example of early narrative comedy and the development of screen comedy techniques.
The film was enormously popular with audiences worldwide upon its release. Theater owners reported that it consistently drew laughs and applause, with audiences particularly responding to Linder's increasingly desperate attempts to catch the flea. The film's universal theme - frustration over minor annoyances - resonated across cultures. In the United States, where Linder had a massive following, the film was one of Pathé's most successful releases of 1912. Audience feedback from the period indicates that viewers appreciated the film's clever premise and Linder's charismatic performance. The film's success led to increased demand for Linder's films internationally and helped cement his status as a global star.
The film survives in various archives, including the Cinémathèque Française and the Library of Congress. Some prints exist with the original Pathé stencil coloring. The film has been restored and is available on various DVD collections of Max Linder's work. While not all original elements survive, enough material exists to present the film in a reasonably complete form. The film is considered well-preserved for its era, thanks to Pathé's practice of maintaining master copies of their most popular productions.