China Town, My China Town

Plot

This 1929 Fleischer Studios animated short features two Chinese characters in a domestic setting. One character is busy eating while the other works at ironing clothes. In a moment of comedic mishap, the eating character accidentally swallows a freshly ironed shirt that was placed in front of him. The cartoon follows the ensuing slapstick chaos as the characters deal with this absurd situation, showcasing the surreal physical comedy that characterized early Fleischer animations. The short concludes with more exaggerated gags typical of the era's cartoon style.

Historical Background

This film was produced during the Great Depression's onset and the transition from silent to sound cinema. 1929 was a watershed year for the film industry, as 'talkies' completely revolutionized entertainment. Animation studios were scrambling to adapt their techniques to incorporate sound, with synchronized dialogue, music, and sound effects becoming essential elements. Fleischer Studios, based in New York, was one of the few successful animation operations outside Hollywood. The period also saw the rise of movie theaters as affordable entertainment during difficult economic times. The cartoon's content reflects the casual racial stereotypes of the era, which were widely accepted in popular culture but are now recognized as harmful. The animation industry was still in its infancy, with techniques and storytelling conventions still being developed.

Making Of

The production of 'China Town, My China Town' took place during a pivotal moment in animation history. The Fleischer brothers were pioneering sound animation techniques at their New York studio, competing with Disney in California. The animators worked on large drawing tables, creating each frame by hand. The sound recording was a complex process, requiring synchronization between the musical score, sound effects, and character movements. The studio employed a team of animators, inkers, and painters who worked in an assembly-line fashion to complete each short. The racial caricatures in the film, while offensive by modern standards, reflected the casual racism prevalent in popular culture of the 1920s. The film's gags were likely developed through collaborative brainstorming sessions among the animation team, with Dave Fleischer providing direction and his brother Max overseeing the technical innovations.

Visual Style

The animation employed the classic black and white cinematography of the era, with stark contrasts and clear silhouettes that enhanced the cartoon's visual impact. The Fleischer style featured the distinctive 'rubber hose' animation technique, where characters moved with exaggerated, boneless flexibility. The camera work included innovative techniques for the time, such as the 3D-like effects achieved through the studio's Setback camera system. The visual gags were emphasized through careful timing and exaggerated movements, taking full advantage of the medium's possibilities. The animation style was more surreal and experimental than Disney's contemporary work, with characters often defying physics in ways that would become a Fleischer trademark.

Innovations

This short demonstrated Fleischer Studios' pioneering work in sound synchronization, which was still a relatively new technology in 1929. The studio's use of the rotoscope technique, invented by Max Fleischer, allowed for more realistic character movement by tracing over live-action footage. The Setback camera system, another Fleischer innovation, created a 3D effect by filming animation cels against miniature three-dimensional sets. The film also showcased the studio's mastery of timing and rhythm in animation, crucial for effective sound synchronization. These technical achievements helped establish Fleischer Studios as a major innovator in early animation and contributed to the development of animation as an art form.

Music

The film featured an early synchronized soundtrack, likely including the popular song 'China Town' which had been composed in the 1910s and remained well-known. The music would have been performed by studio musicians and recorded using the RCA Photophone system. Sound effects were created manually in the studio using various props and techniques, a practice common in early sound production. The soundtrack would have included musical stings to punctuate the visual gags and possibly some limited vocalizations or dialogue from the characters. The bouncing ball technique, if used in this short, would have encouraged audience sing-along participation, making the viewing experience more interactive.

Memorable Scenes

• The iconic moment when the character accidentally swallows the freshly ironed shirt, demonstrating the surreal physical comedy characteristic of early Fleischer animations

What Critics Said

Contemporary critical reception of individual animated shorts in 1929 was minimal, as they were typically reviewed as part of the overall theatrical program. Trade publications like Variety and The Film Daily occasionally mentioned notable cartoons, but detailed reviews were rare. Modern critics and animation historians view these early Fleischer shorts as important artifacts of animation history, though they acknowledge the problematic racial stereotypes. The technical innovation of sound synchronization was generally praised at the time, with critics noting how Fleischer Studios was successfully competing with Disney in the new sound era. Today, these films are studied for their historical significance and artistic techniques, even as their content is criticized for its dated and offensive elements.

What Audiences Thought

Audiences in 1929 were fascinated by the novelty of sound cartoons, and Fleischer's shorts were generally well-received by theatergoers. The combination of music, sound effects, and visual gags provided entertainment value during a difficult economic period. The cartoons' broad physical comedy and simple narratives appealed to audiences of all ages. The bouncing ball sequences, when included, encouraged audience participation and made these shorts particularly popular. While there are no specific records of audience reactions to 'China Town, My China Town' itself, Fleischer Studios cartoons of this period were known to draw positive responses from theater audiences. The racial caricatures, unfortunately, reflected and reinforced common prejudices of the time, meaning they likely did not provoke the negative reactions they would today.

You Might Also Like