Cock Fight, No. 2

Plot

This short Edison film captures a brutal cockfight taking place inside a wire cage, with two male spectators observing from the background. The men engage in animated conversation and wagering, with one demonstratively showing his money to the other while commenting on the ongoing battle between the gamecocks. The birds fight fiercely within the confined space, showcasing the raw violence of this blood sport that was still legal in many areas during the 1890s. The entire sequence serves as an early example of documentary-style filmmaking, capturing an actual event rather than a staged performance. The film concludes without resolution, leaving the outcome of the fight and the bet unknown to the viewer.

Historical Background

This film was created during the very infancy of cinema, less than a year after the first public demonstration of motion pictures. 1894 was a pivotal year in film history, with Edison's Kinetoscope parlors opening in major cities and creating the first commercial audience for motion pictures. The United States was in the midst of the Gilded Age, a period of rapid industrialization and urbanization. Entertainment was becoming increasingly commercialized, and new technologies like electricity and motion pictures were capturing the public imagination. The film also reflects the more permissive attitudes toward animal cruelty in the late 19th century, when blood sports like cockfighting and dogfighting were still legal and popular in many regions. This was also the era before film censorship, when filmmakers could capture virtually any subject matter without restriction.

Making Of

The production of 'Cock Fight, No. 2' took place in Edison's innovative Black Maria studio, a tar-paper-covered building that could rotate on tracks to follow the sun's movement, ensuring optimal lighting for filming. Director William Heise worked with a small team to stage the cockfight within the camera's limited field of view. The birds were likely trained fighting cocks brought in specifically for the production. The two 'spectators' were probably studio employees who were instructed to simulate betting behavior to add human interest to the scene. The entire filming process would have been extremely primitive by modern standards - the heavy Kinetograph camera was mounted on a tripod, and each film strip could only capture about 30 seconds of action before needing to be replaced. The sound of the camera's mechanical operation would have been audible throughout the filming, though of course no synchronized sound was recorded.

Visual Style

The cinematography in 'Cock Fight, No. 2' represents the most basic techniques available to early filmmakers. The camera was stationary, capturing the scene from a single, fixed perspective typical of early Edison productions. The lighting came entirely from natural sunlight through the Black Maria's retractable roof, creating harsh shadows and high contrast. The composition places the fighting cocks in the foreground with the human spectators visible in the background, creating depth within the limited frame. The film was shot on 35mm film using Edison's proprietary Kinetograph camera at approximately 16 frames per second, resulting in the characteristic jerky motion of early cinema. The entire scene is captured in a single continuous take, as editing techniques had not yet been developed.

Innovations

While 'Cock Fight, No. 2' may seem primitive by modern standards, it represented significant technical achievements for its time. The film was produced using Edison's Kinetograph, one of the first practical motion picture cameras, which featured a unique intermittent mechanism allowing for the capture of discrete frames. The film stock itself was an innovation - Edison's laboratory developed the 35mm film format with four perforations per frame that would become the industry standard for decades. The ability to capture motion at all was revolutionary, and the relatively clear image of the fast-moving fighting cocks demonstrated the camera's capabilities. The film also showcases the effectiveness of the Black Maria studio's design, which allowed for consistent lighting in an era before artificial movie lights were available.

Music

No soundtrack was recorded for this film, as synchronized sound technology would not be developed until the late 1920s. When exhibited in Kinetoscope parlors, the film would have been viewed silently, though the noisy mechanical operation of the viewing machine would have been audible to the viewer. In modern screenings, the film is typically accompanied by period-appropriate music or left silent to preserve its historical authenticity.

Memorable Scenes

• The opening shot showing two gamecocks fighting aggressively inside a wire cage while two men in the background gesture and appear to exchange money, creating a tableau of violence and wagering that shocked and fascinated early film audiences

What Critics Said

Contemporary critical reception for such early films was virtually nonexistent, as film criticism had not yet developed as a profession. The film was primarily judged by its commercial success in attracting viewers to Kinetoscope parlors. Modern film historians and scholars view 'Cock Fight, No. 2' as an important example of early actuality filmmaking, though they note its problematic content by today's standards. Critics of early cinema often point to films like this as examples of how the medium initially relied on sensational content to attract audiences. The film is frequently cited in academic discussions about the early film industry's ethics and the evolution of documentary filmmaking techniques.

What Audiences Thought

Audiences in 1894 were fascinated by the novelty of moving images, and films depicting unusual or sensational subjects were particularly popular. Cockfighting was still familiar to many Americans in the 1890s, making this film both exotic and recognizable. Viewers would have paid approximately 25 cents to watch the film on a Kinetoscope, typically as part of a program of several short films. The brief duration and shocking content likely made it memorable for early filmgoers. Modern audiences viewing the film today often express discomfort with the animal violence, though they appreciate it as an important historical artifact showing the origins of documentary cinema.

You Might Also Like