
"She'll teach you everything she knows... and then some!"
Harlot (1971) follows the story of Mary, an open and sexually liberated woman who becomes determined to help her best friend Melody break free from her conservative and repressed lifestyle. Mary convinces the uptight Melody to explore a world of sexual experimentation and freedom, introducing her to various encounters and experiences that challenge her previously held beliefs about sexuality and relationships. As Melody gradually sheds her inhibitions, she discovers new aspects of herself and her desires, leading to both comedic situations and moments of genuine self-discovery. The film explores themes of sexual liberation, female friendship, and the cultural shifts of the early 1970s, all while maintaining a tone that balances exploitation elements with emerging feminist perspectives.
Harlot was produced during the height of the sexploitation era, taking advantage of the more relaxed censorship standards following the collapse of the Hays Code. The film was shot on a low budget typical of the genre, with minimal sets and rapid shooting schedules. Director Michael Benveniste was known for his work in the exploitation film circuit, and this production followed many of the genre's conventions while attempting to incorporate elements of the emerging sexual revolution narrative.
Harlot was released in 1971, a pivotal year in American cultural history. The film emerged during the height of the sexual revolution, following the 1969 Stonewall Riots and during the early years of the women's liberation movement. The collapse of the Motion Picture Production Code (Hays Code) in 1968 had opened the door for more explicit content in mainstream cinema, and the introduction of the MPAA rating system in 1968 created a new market for R-rated and X-rated films. The early 1970s also saw the rise of second-wave feminism, which created a complex relationship with films like Harlot that both exploited and sometimes inadvertently explored female sexuality. The film was part of a larger trend of 'sexploitation' cinema that flourished in grindhouse theaters before being largely displaced by hardcore pornography in the mid-1970s.
Harlot represents an important transitional moment in American cinema's approach to sexuality. While primarily an exploitation film, it reflects the changing attitudes toward female sexuality and sexual freedom that characterized the early 1970s. The film's premise of a sexually liberated woman teaching her repressed friend about sexual exploration mirrors real cultural conversations happening at the time. Though limited by its exploitation nature and low budget, the film contributed to the normalization of discussions about female desire in cinema, however crudely. It also exemplifies how the sexploitation industry attempted to incorporate elements of the counterculture and sexual revolution into their products, creating a unique hybrid of commercial exploitation and cultural commentary.
The production of Harlot followed the typical fast and inexpensive methods of the sexploitation industry. Shot in approximately one week, the film utilized minimal locations, often renting rooms for just a few hours to complete scenes. The cast was composed largely of actors who specialized in exploitation films, many working under pseudonyms. The film was likely shot without synchronized sound, with dialogue and sound effects added in post-production, a common cost-cutting measure in low-budget filmmaking of the era. The director, Michael Benveniste, was known for his ability to complete films quickly and on budget, often working with the same crew members across multiple projects. The film's more explicit scenes were carefully choreographed to push boundaries while avoiding outright pornography, which would have limited its distribution to adult theaters only.
The cinematography of Harlot reflects the limitations and conventions of low-budget exploitation filmmaking of the early 1970s. Shot on color film stock, the visuals are characterized by straightforward camera work, basic lighting setups, and a focus on composition that prioritizes the film's sexual content over artistic expression. The camera work likely employed the 'money shots' technique common in exploitation cinema, using close-ups and suggestive framing to maximize impact while staying within the boundaries of softcore pornography. The visual style probably included handheld camera work for more intimate scenes and static shots for dialogue sequences, all executed with the efficiency required by tight production schedules.
Like many exploitation films of its era, Harrot likely utilized a library music score or a low-budget original composition typical of the genre. The soundtrack would have featured funk and rock-influenced instrumental tracks popular in early 1970s exploitation cinema, designed to enhance the film's 'hip' and sexually liberated atmosphere. The music probably served both to set the mood for sexual scenes and to cover technical deficiencies in the production. Given the film's low budget, it's unlikely that well-known musicians were involved, though the score would have reflected the contemporary musical styles of the period.
Mary: 'Honey, you've been living in a cage your whole life. Isn't it time you learned how to fly?'
Melody: 'But what will people think?' Mary: 'Who cares what they think? What do YOU want?'
Mary: 'There's a whole world out there you've been missing, and I'm going to show it to you.'
Contemporary critical reception of Harlot was virtually nonexistent, as exploitation films of this era were typically ignored by mainstream critics. The few reviews that appeared in specialized film magazines and underground publications were mixed, with some acknowledging the film's attempt to incorporate themes of sexual liberation while criticizing its crude execution and exploitative nature. Modern film historians and exploitation cinema scholars have examined the film primarily as a cultural artifact, noting its place in the transition from softcore to hardcore cinema and its reflection of early 1970s sexual politics. Some contemporary critics have reevaluated films like Harlot for their unintentional documentation of changing sexual mores, however problematic their execution might be.
Harlot found its primary audience in the grindhouse theater circuit, where it appealed to patrons seeking sexual content and sensational entertainment. The film likely performed adequately within its target market, though exact box office figures are unavailable. Audience reception would have varied depending on the viewer's expectations - those seeking titillation were probably satisfied, while those looking for genuine exploration of sexual themes may have been disappointed by the film's exploitation elements. Like many films of its type, it developed a small cult following among exploitation cinema enthusiasts, though it never achieved the notoriety of more famous films from the same era.
Like many exploitation films of the early 1970s, Harlot's preservation status is uncertain. The film likely exists only in degraded 35mm or 16mm prints held by private collectors or specialized film archives. No official restoration or remastering has been undertaken, and the film may be at risk of being lost due to the decomposition of original film elements. Some bootleg or gray market copies may circulate among exploitation film enthusiasts, but these are often of poor quality derived from worn theatrical prints.