Also available on: Wikimedia
Oil Gush Fire in Bibiheybat

Oil Gush Fire in Bibiheybat

1898 1 Russian Empire
Industrial RevolutionHuman vs NatureTechnological ProgressEnvironmental ImpactEconomic Development

Plot

This pioneering documentary short film captures a dramatic oil gusher fire at the Bibi-Heybat oil field near Baku, Azerbaijan. The camera records towering flames and thick black smoke billowing from an uncontrollable oil well, creating a spectacular and dangerous industrial disaster. The film showcases the raw power of petroleum as it erupts from the earth and ignites, demonstrating both the wealth and hazards of the early oil industry. Alexandre Michon's camera work provides one of the earliest moving image records of an industrial accident, preserving this dramatic event for posterity. The footage serves as both a document of a specific incident and a testament to the early days of the oil boom in the Caucasus region.

About the Production

Release Date August 2, 1898
Production Lumière Company
Filmed In Bibi-Heybat, Baku, Russian Empire (now Azerbaijan)

Filmed using a Lumière Cinématographe camera on 35mm film stock. Alexandre Michon, a French photographer living in Baku, was commissioned by the Lumière brothers to document scenes from the Caucasus region. The oil gusher fire was a real industrial disaster that occurred at the Bibi-Heybat oil field, one of the earliest and most productive oil fields in the world. The filming required Michon to position his camera dangerously close to the raging fire to capture the dramatic footage. The film was processed and developed using the techniques available in 1898, which were still in their experimental stages.

Historical Background

This film was created during the very birth of cinema, just three years after the Lumière brothers' first public screening in Paris in 1895. The late 1890s marked the transition from novelty to art form for motion pictures. Simultaneously, Baku was experiencing an unprecedented oil boom, making it one of the wealthiest and most industrialized cities in the Russian Empire. The film captures a pivotal moment when two revolutionary technologies - cinema and petroleum - were both transforming the world. The Caucasus region was a melting pot of cultures, industries, and geopolitical interests, with Baku serving as a crucial center for the global oil trade. This period also saw the rapid expansion of the Russian Empire's industrial capabilities, with oil from Baku fueling modernization across Europe. The film itself represents the globalization of both technology and industry, with French equipment (Lumière camera) being used by a French expatriate to document Russian imperial industry in what would become Azerbaijan.

Why This Film Matters

This film holds immense cultural significance as one of the earliest examples of documentary cinema and the first known film shot in Azerbaijan. It represents the birth of visual documentation of industrial processes and disasters, establishing a tradition that would continue through newsreel and documentary filmmaking. The film is a crucial artifact for understanding the early days of the global petroleum industry and its impact on society. For Azerbaijan, it represents the beginning of the nation's cinematic history and documents a key period in its economic development. The film also demonstrates how cinema from its earliest days was drawn to spectacle and drama, even in non-fiction contexts. It stands as a testament to the international nature of early cinema, with French technology and personnel documenting events in the Russian Empire. The preservation of such early footage provides invaluable insight into industrial practices, urban development, and environmental impacts of the late 19th century.

Making Of

Alexandre Michon, a French expatriate photographer, was commissioned by the Lumière brothers to create films showcasing life and industry in the Caucasus region. Using a Lumière Cinématographe, which was both a camera, projector, and developer, Michon documented various scenes around Baku. The oil gusher fire was not staged but rather a real industrial disaster that Michon captured as it happened. The filming process in 1898 was extremely challenging - the camera was hand-cranked, requiring steady operation, and early film stock was not very sensitive to light. Michon had to transport heavy equipment to the oil field and set up his camera position while the fire raged. The development of the film had to be done carefully by hand using chemical processes that were still being refined. The entire production represents the convergence of cutting-edge technology (cinema) with the cutting-edge industry of the time (petroleum extraction).

Visual Style

The cinematography represents some of the earliest camera work in cinema history. Shot with a Lumière Cinématographe on 35mm film, the camera was likely stationary, mounted on a tripod to capture the oil gusher fire. The framing shows the influence of still photography, with careful composition of the dramatic scene. Early film stock had very low light sensitivity, so the bright flames of the oil fire would have been ideal subjects for exposure. The camera was hand-cranked, meaning the frame rate might have varied slightly during filming. The black and white imagery creates stark contrasts between the dark smoke and bright flames. The single, continuous take demonstrates the limitations and aesthetic of early cinema - no editing, no camera movement, just a direct observation of reality. This straightforward approach actually enhances the documentary power of the footage, presenting the disaster without artifice or manipulation.

Innovations

This film represents several significant technical achievements for its time. It was one of the first films to document an industrial disaster, demonstrating cinema's potential as a tool for documentation beyond entertainment. The use of the Lumière Cinématograthe, which was a revolutionary all-in-one camera, projector, and developer, showcases cutting-edge technology of 1898. Successfully filming such a dynamic and dangerous subject matter with early equipment was a considerable technical challenge. The film demonstrates early understanding of exposure techniques, capturing the bright flames of the oil fire without overexposing the film. The preservation of moving images of such an early date is itself a technical achievement. The film also represents the international spread of cinema technology from France to the Russian Empire. The ability to transport and operate the bulky and delicate equipment of the era in an industrial setting shows the adaptability of early filmmakers.

Memorable Scenes

  • The opening shot showing towering flames and thick black smoke erupting from the oil well, capturing the raw power and danger of early industrial petroleum extraction in a single, uninterrupted take that preserves this dramatic moment for eternity.

Did You Know?

  • This is considered one of the first documentary films ever made and among the earliest films shot in the Caucasus region.
  • Alexandre Michon was actually a photographer and cinema enthusiast who operated a photo studio in Baku before becoming a filmmaker.
  • The Bibi-Heybat oil field was one of the world's first commercial oil fields, with oil extraction dating back to the 8th century.
  • The film was part of a program of 15 short films that Michon showed at his photography studio in Baku on August 2, 1898.
  • This film predates many famous early films including Georges Méliès' 'A Trip to the Moon' (1902) and Edwin S. Porter's 'The Great Train Robbery' (1903).
  • The Lumière brothers, who provided the camera, were among the very first filmmakers in history and invented the Cinématographe device.
  • Baku in the 1890s was producing more than half of the world's oil, making it a crucial location for documenting the early petroleum industry.
  • The film demonstrates how early cinema was immediately drawn to dramatic, spectacular events rather than staged narratives.
  • Only a few fragments of Michon's work survive today, making this film particularly precious to film historians.
  • The oil industry in Azerbaijan was dominated by foreign investment, particularly from Nobel and Rothschild families, during this period.

What Critics Said

Contemporary critical reception of this film is largely undocumented, as film criticism as a discipline had not yet been established in 1898. The film was shown as part of Michon's demonstration program at his photography studio in Baku, where it likely amazed audiences who had never seen moving images before. Modern film historians and critics recognize the film as a pioneering work of documentary cinema. It is frequently cited in academic works about early cinema, industrial films, and the history of Azerbaijani film. Critics today appreciate its raw power as a document of both early cinema and industrial history. The film is valued for its authenticity and its role in establishing the documentary tradition of capturing real events as they unfold. Its historical importance far outweighs any aesthetic considerations, though it is admired for its bold composition and dramatic content.

What Audiences Thought

The original audience reception in 1898 would have been one of astonishment and wonder, as most viewers had never before seen moving images. The sight of actual flames and smoke captured on film would have been particularly impressive and perhaps terrifying to contemporary audiences. The film was part of a novelty program that attracted curious spectators to Michon's photography studio in Baku. Local audiences would have been familiar with oil gushers and fires, but seeing one preserved in motion pictures would have been a revelation. Modern audiences viewing the film in archives or retrospectives typically react with fascination at seeing such an early document of industrial history. The film serves as a time machine, transporting viewers back to the very beginning of both cinema and the modern petroleum age. Today, it is primarily appreciated by film historians, archivists, and those interested in industrial and Azerbaijani history.

Film Connections

Influenced By

  • Lumière brothers' actuality films
  • Early documentary tradition
  • Industrial photography
  • News photography

This Film Influenced

  • Early industrial documentaries
  • Disaster films
  • Newsreel tradition
  • Azerbaijani documentary cinema

You Might Also Like

Arrival of a Train (1895)Workers Leaving the Lumière Factory (1895)The Black Diamond (1903)A Corner in Wheat (1909)Manhatta (1921)

Film Restoration

The film is partially preserved with some fragments surviving in film archives. While the complete original may be lost, portions of this historically significant work are maintained in film archives, particularly those specializing in early cinema. The surviving elements have been digitized for preservation purposes. Given its age and the fragility of early film stock, the preservation of any footage is remarkable. The film is considered an important part of early cinema heritage and of Azerbaijani cultural history, warranting continued preservation efforts.

Themes & Topics

oilfiredisasterindustrydocumentaryBakuCaucasussilent film19th centurypetroleumexplosionsmokeflamesindustrial accident