Rautakylän vanha parooni

Plot

The Drakenhjelm family has presided over the Rautakylä manor for over 150 years, but its current master, the elderly Baron Magnus, lives in a state of moral and physical decay. For years, he has maintained an unregistered relationship with his housekeeper Lisette, with whom he fathered a son, Sebastian. As the Baron falls deathly ill, a desperate Lisette and the opportunistic Sebastian pressure him to formalize their union through marriage to secure the family inheritance. However, their schemes are interrupted when a group of travelers seeking refuge from a violent storm arrives at the manor, triggering a series of supernatural encounters and the revelation of long-buried family secrets. The film culminates in a haunting confrontation between the living and the spectral remnants of the Drakenhjelm lineage, ultimately thwarting the housekeeper's grab for power.

Historical Background

In 1923, Finland was a young nation, having gained independence from Russia only six years prior in 1917. The film industry, led by Suomi-Filmi, was focused on establishing a distinct national identity while also proving it could compete with international standards of filmmaking. 'Rautakylän vanha parooni' reflects a period of 'Nordic Gothic' fascination, where filmmakers looked back at the Swedish colonial past (the Gustavian era) to find stories of aristocracy, morality, and the supernatural. This era of filmmaking was also influenced by the German Expressionist movement, which was beginning to permeate European cinema with its use of shadows and psychological horror.

Making Of

The production was a showcase for Karl Fager's dual talents as a director and a production designer; he was instrumental in creating the film's eerie atmosphere through elaborate set dressings and the use of the naturally gothic Herttoniemi Manor. The casting of Adolf Lindfors was considered a major coup, bringing high-culture prestige to a genre (horror) that was often dismissed as low-brow entertainment. During filming, the crew had to manage the challenges of shooting in a historic manor with limited heating and lighting infrastructure, which inadvertently contributed to the stark, shadowy aesthetic of the final product. The supernatural effects, including the appearance of ghosts, were achieved through traditional in-camera double exposure techniques common in the silent era.

Visual Style

The cinematography is characterized by its use of deep shadows and the atmospheric exploitation of the Herttoniemi Manor's architecture. It employs standard silent-era techniques such as iris shots to focus attention and double exposures to create ghostly apparitions. The lighting, though limited by the technology of the time, effectively contrasts the 'modern' 19th-century setting of the frame story with the more opulent, brightly lit flashbacks to the 18th-century Swedish court.

Innovations

The film is notable for its early use of double exposure to create 'transparent' ghosts, a technique that was cutting-edge for the fledgling Finnish film industry in 1923. It also successfully integrated location shooting with studio sets, creating a seamless sense of place that was more advanced than many contemporary Finnish productions.

Music

As a silent film, it originally had no synchronized soundtrack. Screenings in 1923 would have been accompanied by live piano or a small salon orchestra, likely playing a mix of classical pieces and dramatic improvisations suited to the horror genre. Modern restorations have been screened with new scores composed to emphasize the gothic and supernatural elements.

Memorable Scenes

• The arrival of the travelers during the thunderstorm, which shifts the tone from a domestic drama to a gothic horror.
• The deathbed scene where Baron Magnus is pressured to sign the marriage papers while spectral figures appear to watch from the corners of the room.
• The flashback sequence to the court of King Gustav III, providing a stark, elegant contrast to the decaying state of the manor in the film's 'present' day.

What Critics Said

At the time of its release, critics praised the film for its high production values and the powerful performance of Adolf Lindfors. It was noted for its successful 'atmosphere of dread' and its faithful adaptation of Topelius's beloved story. Modern critics view it as a fascinating, if technically primitive, example of early genre experimentation, noting that while the pacing may feel slow to contemporary viewers, the visual composition and use of location are remarkably effective for the period.

What Audiences Thought

The film was a notable box office hit in 1923, particularly in Helsinki where it premiered at the prestigious Kino-Palatsi. Audiences were reportedly enthralled by the ghost sequences and the dramatic tension of the inheritance plot. Its success helped solidify Suomi-Filmi's dominance in the domestic market during the 1920s.

You Might Also Like