Why Mrs. Jones Got a Divorce

Plot

The film opens in a kitchen where a pretty cook is mixing bread dough. Mr. Jones unexpectedly returns home from a trip carrying a dress suitcase and inquires about his wife's whereabouts. The cook informs him that his wife is absent, and Jones, feeling hungry, requests something to eat. The obliging cook prepares food for him, but Jones becomes increasingly unruly and flirtatious, chuckling the cook under the chin. In a moment of intimacy, the cook embraces Jones around the neck, inadvertently leaving flour fingerprints on the back of his suit - the incriminating evidence that will later lead to Mrs. Jones filing for divorce when she discovers these tell-tale marks.

Historical Background

The year 1900 was a pivotal moment in cinema history. The film industry was transitioning from novelty to entertainment, with permanent movie theaters beginning to replace traveling shows. Edison Manufacturing Company was one of the dominant forces in American cinema, engaged in fierce competition with other studios like Biograph and Vitagraph. This period saw the development of narrative filmmaking, moving away from simple actualities toward stories with characters and plots. The film was made during the height of the Edison Trust's control over the American film industry, before the eventual breakup of this monopoly. Domestic comedies like this one reflected the Victorian-era concerns with morality and social propriety, even while pushing boundaries with their suggestive content.

Making Of

The production of this film exemplifies the efficient factory-like approach Edison used for filmmaking. Director James H. White would have worked with a small crew and actors who were paid daily rates. The kitchen set was likely constructed quickly using flats and props from Edison's extensive collection. The actors would have rehearsed briefly before the camera started rolling, and the entire film was probably completed in just a few takes. The flour used in the film was a practical effect that had to be carefully managed to avoid contaminating the expensive camera equipment. Early Edison films like this were typically completed in a single day, from setup to final print.

Visual Style

The film was shot using a stationary camera positioned to capture the entire kitchen set, typical of the period's cinematography. The lighting would have been natural or artificial studio lighting designed to illuminate the set evenly. The camera work was simple and functional, focusing on clearly presenting the action rather than artistic expression. The composition follows the theatrical tradition of keeping important action within the frame's center, ensuring all gestures and expressions were visible to the audience.

Innovations

While not technically innovative, this film demonstrates the mastery of basic filmmaking techniques that were still being developed in 1900. The use of props (flour) as a storytelling device shows an understanding of cinematic visual language. The film's clear narrative structure and effective use of physical comedy represent the refinement of storytelling techniques that would become standard in narrative cinema. The film also showcases Edison's reliable equipment and consistent film quality.

Music

As a silent film, it would have been accompanied by live music during exhibition. Typical accompaniment might include a pianist playing popular tunes of the era or improvising mood-appropriate music. The Edison catalogue sometimes suggested specific musical pieces for their films, though no specific recommendations are known for this title. The music would have emphasized the comedic moments and helped convey the emotional tone of each scene.

Memorable Scenes

• The climactic moment when the cook embraces Jones, leaving incriminating flour handprints on his suit - the visual evidence that will seal his fate when his wife returns home

What Critics Said

Contemporary reviews from trade papers like the New York Clipper and The Moving Picture World generally praised Edison's domestic comedies for their humor and technical quality. Critics noted the film's clear storytelling and effective use of physical comedy. Modern film historians view this film as a typical but well-executed example of early American comedy cinema, valuable for its demonstration of emerging narrative techniques and social themes of the period.

What Audiences Thought

Audiences in 1900 found this type of domestic comedy highly entertaining and relatable. The film's mix of humor, mild scandal, and domestic familiarity appealed to the primarily working-class and middle-class audiences of early nickelodeons. The visual nature of the storytelling made it accessible to immigrant audiences who might not understand English dialogue. The film was likely popular enough that Edison continued to produce similar domestic comedies throughout the early 1900s.

You Might Also Like