Attack on a China Mission

Plot

Set during the Boxer Rebellion in China, this dramatic short film depicts a harrowing attack on a Christian mission station. A lone man desperately attempts to defend a woman and the mission house against a mob of Chinese attackers armed with swords, guns, and paddles. Despite his valiant efforts, he is vastly outnumbered and outmatched by the relentless assault. The film captures the tension and violence of the attack as the defenders face overwhelming odds. The climactic sequence leaves the fate of the mission and its occupants uncertain, reflecting the real-life dangers faced by missionaries during this turbulent historical period.

Historical Background

The film was produced during the height of the Boxer Rebellion, a violent anti-foreign and anti-Christian uprising in northern China that lasted from 1899 to 1901. This conflict received extensive coverage in Western newspapers and captured public imagination, making it a popular subject for early filmmakers. The rebellion represented a clash between traditional Chinese culture and Western imperialism, with foreign missionaries being particularly targeted. In 1900, cinema was still in its infancy, and filmmakers were discovering the power of using contemporary events as subject matter. Williamson's film was part of a broader trend of 'actualities' and dramatizations of current events that helped establish film as a medium for both entertainment and news.

Making Of

James Williamson, a former chemist and photographer, established the Williamson Kinematograph Company in 1898. For this production, he transformed his garden in Hove into a makeshift film set, constructing detailed props and scenery to represent the Chinese mission. The actors were likely local amateurs or Williamson's associates, as professional film actors did not yet exist. The Chinese attackers were portrayed by British actors wearing stereotypical makeup and costumes, reflecting the limited cultural awareness and racial attitudes of the era. The film was shot in a single day using natural light, and the action sequences were carefully choreographed to maximize impact within the technical limitations of early cinema equipment.

Visual Style

The cinematography was typical of the period, utilizing a stationary camera positioned to capture the entire action in a single wide shot. However, Williamson demonstrated innovative use of depth within the frame, creating layers of action that added visual complexity. The film employed careful staging and choreography to create dynamic movement within the static frame. Natural lighting was used throughout, with scenes carefully timed to take advantage of daylight. The cinematographer (likely Williamson himself) used the limited technical resources available to create maximum visual impact through composition and actor movement.

Innovations

The film demonstrated several technical innovations for its time, including the use of multiple set changes within a single narrative to show different locations. Williamson employed sophisticated editing techniques for the era, creating a sense of continuity between scenes. The production also featured early examples of special effects, including simulated gunfire and the destruction of props. The film's action sequences required careful timing and coordination, representing an advancement in cinematic choreography. Williamson's use of close-up inserts for dramatic emphasis was particularly innovative for 1900.

Music

As a silent film, it had no synchronized soundtrack. During exhibition, it would have been accompanied by live music, typically a pianist or small orchestra in larger theaters. The musical accompaniment would have been improvised or selected from existing classical pieces to match the film's dramatic tone. In some venues, sound effects such as gunshots or shouts might have been created backstage by theater staff to enhance the viewing experience.

Memorable Scenes

• The climactic siege sequence where the lone defender faces overwhelming odds against the attacking horde, utilizing dynamic movement and staged violence that was unprecedented in early cinema

What Critics Said

Contemporary reviews in trade publications praised the film's dramatic intensity and technical execution. The Bioscope magazine noted its 'realistic depiction of the horrors of missionary life in heathen lands.' Modern film historians recognize it as an important early example of narrative cinema and Williamson's innovative approach to filmmaking. Critics today view it both as a technical achievement for its time and as a problematic artifact of colonial-era attitudes toward non-Western cultures.

What Audiences Thought

The film was reportedly popular with audiences in Britain and abroad, particularly in the United States where interest in the Boxer Rebellion was high. Viewers were impressed by the film's action sequences and dramatic tension, which were considered quite sophisticated for the era. The film's exploitation of contemporary events made it particularly appealing to audiences seeking cinematic representations of current affairs. Its success encouraged Williamson and other filmmakers to produce more elaborate dramatic films based on recent historical events.

You Might Also Like