Moscow Strikes Back

Plot

This powerful Soviet documentary chronicles the pivotal Battle of Moscow from October 1941 to January 1942, when Red Army forces successfully repelled the German advance on the Soviet capital. The film combines harrowing frontline combat footage captured by multiple cameramen during actual fighting with scenes of civilian suffering and Nazi atrocities discovered in liberated territories. Through its carefully crafted narrative, the film portrays not just a military victory but the resilience of the Russian people and their cultural heritage against the fascist invasion. The documentary culminates with the Soviet counteroffensive that pushed German forces back from Moscow's outskirts, marking the first major strategic defeat of the Wehrmacht in World War II. The film serves as both historical documentation and propaganda, emphasizing themes of national unity, sacrifice, and the indomitable spirit of the Soviet people defending their homeland.

Historical Background

The film was produced during one of the most critical periods of World War II, when the Soviet Union faced the existential threat of Nazi Germany's Operation Barbarossa. The Battle of Moscow represented the first major strategic defeat of the German Wehrmacht and marked a crucial turning point in the war on the Eastern Front. In October 1941, German forces had advanced to within 30 kilometers of Moscow, and the Soviet government was preparing for possible evacuation. The successful defense of the capital, aided by brutally cold winter conditions and Soviet reinforcements from Siberia, proved that the German war machine could be stopped. The film's production began while the battle was still raging, making it not just a documentary but a weapon in the information war. At the time of its release, the United States had recently entered the war following Pearl Harbor, and American public opinion about the Soviet Union was still ambivalent. The film served as crucial propaganda to demonstrate Soviet military capability and build support for the alliance among Western populations. It also represented the Soviet film industry's transition from peacetime production to total war mobilization, with all resources directed toward supporting the war effort.

Making Of

The production of 'Moscow Strikes Back' represents one of the most daring documentary filmmaking efforts of World War II. The filmmakers, led by directors Leonid Varlamov and Ilya Kopalin, assembled a team of over 30 cameramen who were embedded with various Soviet units during the actual battle. These cameramen, many of whom were professional journalists turned soldiers, worked with hand-cranked 35mm cameras that had been specially modified to function in temperatures as low as -40°C. They developed innovative techniques including using vodka as antifreeze for camera mechanisms and creating heated casings for film magazines. The filmmakers faced constant danger from artillery fire, air raids, and advancing German troops. Several cameramen were wounded while filming, and at least two were killed in action. The editing process was equally challenging, as the team had to sort through over 100,000 feet of film shot under chaotic conditions while dealing with wartime shortages of editing equipment and film stock. The Soviet authorities provided unlimited access to military operations but also imposed strict ideological requirements on the final product. The English version was produced in New York under the supervision of the Office of War Information, with Edward G. Robinson recording his narration in a single marathon session.

Visual Style

The film's cinematography represents a quantum leap in combat documentation, featuring some of the earliest authentic battle footage ever captured under active combat conditions. The filmmakers employed multiple camera formats, including handheld 35mm cameras, portable Eyemo cameras, and even some 16mm equipment for rapid deployment. The cinematographers developed innovative techniques for night filming, using the light from explosions and fires to illuminate scenes. The winter conditions presented unique challenges, with cameramen working in temperatures that could freeze standard camera equipment within minutes. They used specially lubricated mechanisms and heated casings to keep the cameras functioning. The resulting footage has a distinctive grainy, high-contrast quality that enhances its raw authenticity. The film pioneered the use of multiple camera angles during combat sequences, with cameras positioned at ground level, on vehicles, and at elevated positions to create comprehensive coverage of battle scenes. The cinematography also included innovative tracking shots using cameras mounted on moving tanks and sleds, creating dynamic movement that would influence action cinematography for decades. The visual style balanced wide establishing shots of the battle landscape with intimate close-ups of soldiers and civilians, creating a powerful emotional narrative.

Innovations

The film pioneered numerous technical innovations in documentary filmmaking that would influence the field for decades. The use of multiple frontline cameramen working simultaneously across a vast battlefield created a comprehensive record of the battle from various perspectives, establishing techniques that would become standard in modern war coverage. The filmmakers developed special equipment modifications to allow cameras to function in extreme cold, including heated camera housings, special lubricants that wouldn't freeze, and insulated film magazines. They created portable power systems using car batteries when standard electrical sources were unavailable. The editing techniques used to combine footage from different sources into a coherent narrative were groundbreaking, particularly the use of montage to create dramatic tension while maintaining documentary authenticity. The film demonstrated early examples of what would later be called 'embedded journalism,' with cameramen operating as integral parts of military units. The successful synchronization of sound with combat footage represented another significant technical achievement, as the filmmakers developed methods to record clear audio during active combat. The film's distribution also broke new ground, with the creation of multiple language versions and the development of international distribution networks for wartime documentaries.

Music

The original Soviet version featured a powerful orchestral score composed by Dmitri Shostakovich and Sergei Prokofiev, combining traditional Russian musical themes with martial compositions that emphasized the dramatic nature of the battle footage. The music was designed to evoke both the tragedy of the invasion and the heroism of the Soviet defense, incorporating folk melodies and patriotic songs familiar to Russian audiences. The score made innovative use of leitmotifs to represent different aspects of the conflict, with themes for the German advance, Soviet resistance, civilian suffering, and eventual victory. In the English-language version, the score was retained but remixed to accommodate Edward G. Robinson's narration. The soundtrack also made effective use of diegetic sounds from the battlefield, including artillery fire, tank engines, aircraft, and civilian voices, which were carefully synchronized with the visual footage. The sound engineers developed techniques to capture clear audio during combat, using directional microphones and innovative recording methods that were groundbreaking for documentary work. The musical arrangements were particularly notable for their ability to enhance the emotional impact of the footage without overwhelming the documentary's claim to authenticity.

Memorable Scenes

• The opening sequence showing Moscow's citizens digging anti-tank trenches while priceless artworks from the Tretyakov Gallery are evacuated to safety
• The dramatic footage of the first major snowfall that marked the turning point in the battle, showing German troops unprepared for the brutal Russian winter
• Scenes of civilian refugees fleeing the advancing German forces through snow-covered forests, often with only what they could carry on their backs
• The counteroffensive sequences showing Soviet T-34 tanks advancing through deep snow while infantry follows on skis
• The documentation of Nazi atrocities in liberated villages, including mass graves and the systematic destruction of homes and cultural sites
• The final victory celebrations in Moscow's Red Square, with battle-hardened troops marching past the Kremlin as civilians cheer
• The night battle sequences lit only by explosions and searchlights, creating surreal images of modern warfare in winter darkness
• Scenes of factory workers continuing production even as air raid sirens blare, demonstrating total war mobilization

What Critics Said

Contemporary critics praised the film's unprecedented authenticity and technical achievement. The New York Times called it 'a document of extraordinary historical importance' and noted that 'the camera has been placed where no camera has ever been before.' Variety praised its 'raw, unvarnished truth' and predicted it would 'stand as one of the most important war documents ever filmed.' British critics were equally impressed, with the Monthly Film Bulletin calling it 'a testament to human courage and the power of the documentary camera.' Modern critics and film historians recognize the film as a landmark in documentary history, despite acknowledging its propagandistic elements. The British Film Institute describes it as 'a groundbreaking work of combat cinematography that changed how wars would be documented.' Film scholar Erik Barnouw has noted that the film 'established many of the visual conventions of the modern war documentary.' Critics particularly praise the film's willingness to show the brutal realities of war, including civilian casualties and the physical toll of combat, which was unprecedented for mainstream audiences of the time.

What Audiences Thought

The film was received with tremendous enthusiasm in both the Soviet Union and among Allied countries. Soviet audiences found it deeply inspiring during the darkest period of the war, with reports of standing ovations and spontaneous patriotic demonstrations at screenings. In the United States, audiences were shocked by the graphic nature of the footage, which was far more explicit than anything previously shown in American theaters. The film broke box office records for a documentary in several major American cities, indicating strong public interest in the Eastern Front. Many American viewers reported that the film changed their perception of the Soviet Union and the scale of the fighting in Russia. British audiences responded similarly, with the film helping to build support for the Soviet alliance. Veterans of the Eastern Front have later confirmed the accuracy of the combat footage, noting that it captured the reality of the fighting better than any other contemporary documentary. The film's success led to increased donations to Soviet war relief funds in both America and Britain. Despite its propaganda purpose, many viewers appreciated its honest portrayal of the suffering endured by civilians and soldiers alike.

You Might Also Like