Cinderella or The Glass Slipper

"Midnight magic in Méliès color"

Keys: Space play/pause · ←/→ 10s · F fullscreen · M mute · </> speed

About this film

Georges Méliès's first attempt at Cinderella was in 1899. That film was extraordinary then for having multiple scenes and a semblance of a narrative; additionally, the use of dissolves as transitions in it influenced other filmmakers for years to do the same.

Cast & crew

More about this film

About the production

Release date1912
Box officePoor - the film was not commercially successful and contributed to Méliès's financial decline
ProductionStar Film
Filmed inMéliès Studio, Montreuil-sous-Bois, France

This was Méliès's second adaptation of Cinderella, following his groundbreaking 1899 version. The production marked a significant departure from Méliès's signature style, as he reluctantly adopted newer cinematic techniques like direct cuts and match-on-action shots to remain contemporary. The film was one of Méliès's last major productions before his bankruptcy and the loss of his studio in 1913. Unlike his earlier works, Méliès showed willingness to incorporate techniques from other filmmakers, though he maintained his theatrical presentation style.

Themes

Transformation and metamorphosisSocial mobility and classVirtue rewarded and vice punishedMagical intervention in human affairsThe power of dreams and wishes

Themes & topics

fairy talemagictransformationroyal ballglass slipperfairy godmotherprincestepfamilymidnightpumpkin coachmistreatmentrecognitionmarriagehappily ever after

Historical background

Cinderella or The Glass Slipper reached screens around 1912, produced in its country of origin. Silent-era houses paired such titles with live music and newsreel bills.

Why this film matters

Researchers cite Cinderella or The Glass Slipper when tracing screen culture of its decade. Catalog notes sometimes claim priority in national or technical history.

Making of

The production of this 1912 Cinderella reveals a filmmaker at a crossroads, desperately trying to adapt to a rapidly changing industry. Georges Méliès, once the undisputed king of cinematic fantasy, found himself struggling against new narrative styles and techniques that had made his theatrical approach seem quaint. During filming, Méliès reportedly experimented with techniques he had previously avoided, including direct cuts and continuity editing that were becoming standard in American and European cinema. The casting of Jacques Feyder, who would later become a major director, suggests Méliès was still connected to the French film community despite his declining influence. Production took place at Méliès's elaborate glass studio in Montreuil, which had been the birthplace of countless cinematic fantasies but was now showing signs of financial strain. The film's special effects, while still employing Méliès's expertise in substitution splices and multiple exposures, were simplified compared to his earlier masterpieces, possibly due to budget constraints or the pressure to produce more quickly. Behind the scenes, this production represented both Méliès's dedication to his craft and his inability to fully embrace the cinematic revolution that was rendering his style obsolete.

What critics said

Reviewers in 1912 weighed Cinderella or The Glass Slipper on clarity, pacing, and audience response rather than prestige status. No single canonical review dominates later reference works for the title.

Did you know?

  • This was Georges Méliès's second adaptation of Cinderella, 13 years after his groundbreaking 1899 version which pioneered multi-scene narrative in cinema
  • The film features one of cinema's early examples of a match-on-action shot during the slipper-fitting scene, showing Méliès adapting to newer techniques
  • Unlike Méliès's signature style, this film uses direct cuts instead of dissolves for transitions, indicating his attempt to modernize his approach
  • Jacques Feyder, who appears in the cast, would later become one of France's most important directors of the 1920s and 1930s
  • The film was produced during a period when Méliès was struggling financially and creatively, as newer cinematic styles had made his theatrical approach seem outdated
  • Méliès's first Cinderella (1899) was extraordinary for its time with multiple scenes and narrative structure, but by 1912, such techniques had become standard
  • This version was likely hand-colored, as was common with Méliès's films, though color versions may not survive
  • The film represents one of Méliès's final attempts to remain relevant in rapidly evolving cinema landscape
  • Méliès's studio in Montreuil, where this was filmed, would be lost to him the following year due to financial difficulties
  • The glass slipper effects were likely achieved using Méliès's mastery of substitution splices and multiple exposure techniques

Visual style

The cinematography of Méliès's 1912 Cinderella represents a hybrid of his signature theatrical style and newer cinematic techniques he was reluctantly adopting. Unlike his earlier works which relied heavily on dissolves between scenes, this film incorporates direct cuts, reflecting Méliès's attempt to modernize his approach. The camera work maintains Méliès's characteristic static, proscenium-style framing, treating the film frame as a theatrical stage with action occurring within a fixed perspective. The glass slipper effects were likely achieved through Méliès's mastery of substitution splices and multiple exposure techniques, though possibly simplified compared to his earlier masterpieces. The match-on-action shot during the slipper-fitting scene demonstrates Méliès's adaptation of continuity editing principles that were becoming standard in narrative cinema. Visual composition still follows Méliès's theatrical principles with careful staging of actors within the frame, creating tableaux that emphasize clarity and spectacle over naturalism.

Innovations

While not as technically innovative as Méliès's earlier masterpieces, this 1912 Cinderella contains several notable technical achievements that reflect both his expertise and his adaptation to newer cinematic techniques. The film's match-on-action shot during the slipper-fitting scene represents one of cinema's early examples of this editing technique, demonstrating Méliès's willingness to incorporate methods from other filmmakers. The glass slipper effects likely employed Méliès's refined substitution splices and multiple exposure techniques, though possibly simplified from his earlier works. The production maintained Méliès's elaborate set designs and theatrical staging, which had always been technical strengths of his films. The incorporation of direct cuts instead of dissolves shows technical adaptation to changing cinematic conventions. If hand-colored versions existed, they would have utilized Méliès's sophisticated stencil coloring process, which was among the most advanced color techniques of the period.

Music

Like all films of 1912, Méliès's Cinderella was originally silent and would have been accompanied by live music during theatrical screenings. The musical accompaniment would typically have been provided by a pianist, organist, or small orchestra in the theater, playing selections that matched the mood and action of each scene. For a fairy tale like Cinderella, the musical program would likely have included classical pieces appropriate to the romantic and magical elements of the story, possibly including works by composers like Tchaikovsky, whose ballet scores were popular for film accompaniment. Theaters might have used cue sheets provided by the distributor or created their own musical programs based on the film's content. During the fairy godmother's appearance and magical transformations, the music would have been more fantastical and wondrous, while the ballroom scenes would have featured dance-appropriate pieces.

Famous quotes

No dialogue survives as this is a silent film

Memorable scenes

  • The magical transformation of the pumpkin into a coach using Méliès's special effects techniques
  • The fairy godmother's appearance and magical intervention
  • The royal ball scene with Cinderella's entrance
  • The midnight escape with the lost glass slipper
  • The innovative match-on-action shot during the slipper-fitting sequence
  • Cinderella's mistreatment by her stepfamily
  • The final recognition scene and transformation back to ball attire

What audiences thought

Audience reception to Méliès's 1912 Cinderella was likely disappointing, contributing to the financial difficulties that would soon force the pioneering filmmaker out of business. By 1912, moviegoers had become accustomed to more sophisticated narrative techniques and longer films, making Méliès's theatrical style seem quaint and outdated. Contemporary audiences, who had been captivated by Méliès's earlier magical fantasies, probably found this version less innovative and engaging compared to newer offerings from American and European studios. The film's poor reception reflected broader shifts in public taste toward more realistic storytelling and away from the stage-bound fantasies that had characterized early cinema. Modern audiences encountering the film through archives and screenings view it primarily as a historical curiosity, appreciating it more for its place in film history than for its entertainment value. The contrast between audience enthusiasm for Méliès's 1899 Cinderella and the likely indifference to this 1912 version perfectly illustrates how rapidly cinematic tastes and technologies evolved in the medium's first two decades.

Film connections

Influenced by

  • Charles Perrault's 'Cendrillon' (1697)
  • The Brothers Grimm's 'Aschenputtel'
  • Méliès's own 1899 'Cinderella'
  • Stage theatrical traditions
  • French féerie theatrical genre
  • Pantomime traditions

This film influenced

  • Subsequent Cinderella adaptations in the silent era
  • Later fairy tale films that attempted to blend traditional fantasy with newer cinematic techniques

Film restoration

The preservation status of Méliès's 1912 Cinderella is uncertain, as many of his later films are lost or exist only in fragments. Unlike his better-known early works, this film has not been widely circulated in film archives or home video releases. Some sources suggest that fragments or incomplete versions may exist in European film archives, particularly the Cinémathèque Française, which holds many Méliès films. The film's survival status reflects the unfortunate fate of many of Méliès's later works, which were not as carefully preserved as his more famous early productions. If complete versions exist, they may be in poor condition due to the nitrate film stock used during this period.

Where to watch

  • Currently not widely available for viewing due to preservation status
  • May be accessible through specialized film archives like the Cinémathèque Française
  • Potential screenings at silent film festivals or Méliès retrospectives
  • Not available on mainstream streaming platforms or home video
  • Film scholars and researchers may access through academic archives