Sex Madness

Sex Madness

1938 62 minutes United States

"The Picture That Shows the Dangers of Social Diseases!"

Sexual education through fearMoral consequences of premarital sexSocial stigma of sexually transmitted diseasesUrban corruption of rural innocenceMedical quackery vs. legitimate treatment

Plot

Sex Madness follows the tragic story of Linda Wood, a young beauty queen from a small town who travels to New York City to pursue a modeling career. After being tricked into a sexual encounter by a predatory photographer, she contracts syphilis and must face the devastating consequences. The film depicts her journey through denial, shame, and the difficult decision between two treatment options: the slow but proven Wassermann treatment versus a questionable miracle cure promising quick results. As her condition worsens, Linda's relationships with her fiancé Paul and family are strained, highlighting the social stigma surrounding sexually transmitted diseases in the 1930s. The narrative serves as both a cautionary tale and an exploitation of public fears about venereal disease, culminating in Linda's eventual acceptance of proper medical treatment and the film's moralizing conclusion about the dangers of premarital sex.

About the Production

Release Date November 1938
Budget Approximately $15,000-$25,000 (typical for Esper's exploitation films)
Box Office Unknown, but exploitation films of this era often earned $100,000-$500,000 through roadshow exhibitions
Production Dwain Esper Productions, Roadshow Attractions Inc.
Filmed In New York City (partial location shots), Los Angeles (studio work)

Filmed in just 6-8 days on a minimal budget, typical of Esper's rapid production methods. The film used non-union actors to keep costs down and employed stock footage whenever possible. Medical scenes were shot with minimal consultation, leading to numerous inaccuracies that were nonetheless convincing to contemporary audiences. The production operated outside the Hays Code by claiming educational purposes, allowing it to show content forbidden in mainstream Hollywood films.

Historical Background

Sex Madness was produced during a unique period in American cinema when the Hays Code was strictly enforced in Hollywood, creating a market for independently produced exploitation films that pushed boundaries. The late 1930s saw heightened public awareness of sexually transmitted diseases due to government campaigns and military concerns about troop health. The Great Depression created economic conditions that made low-budget exploitation films profitable, as they could be produced cheaply and marketed to audiences seeking sensational entertainment. The film's release coincided with growing public health initiatives regarding venereal disease, though these were rarely discussed openly in polite society. The pre-WWII era also saw increased mobility of young people moving to cities for work, creating social anxieties about moral corruption that exploitation films like Sex Madness capitalized upon. The film's educational veneer reflected a common tactic of the era to circumvent censorship while delivering titillating content to audiences hungry for material forbidden in mainstream cinema.

Why This Film Matters

Sex Madness represents an important chapter in American film history as part of the exploitation genre that operated parallel to mainstream Hollywood cinema. The film and others like it created a space for discussing taboo subjects that mainstream films couldn't address due to censorship. It reflects the complex relationship between commerce, morality, and public health education in 1930s America. The film's existence demonstrates how entrepreneurs like Esper found creative ways to circumvent the Hays Code while meeting public demand for controversial content. These exploitation films often served as unofficial sex education for audiences who had no other access to information about sexually transmitted diseases. The film also illustrates the era's approach to moral education through fear tactics and sensationalism rather than comprehensive health information. Its distribution methods prefigured later independent film distribution models, showing how filmmakers could succeed outside the studio system.

Making Of

Dwain Esper's production methods were notoriously frugal and rapid. He would often reuse sets, props, and even footage from his previous films to cut costs. The cast was typically composed of struggling actors paid minimal daily rates, with many working under pseudonyms. Medical scenes were staged with little regard for accuracy, as the primary goal was shock value rather than education. Esper's wife, Hildegarde Stadie, often wrote or co-wrote the screenplays for his films, including Sex Madness. The production operated entirely outside the studio system, allowing it to bypass Hays Code restrictions. The film was marketed through sensational newspaper ads and often preceded by 'lectures' from supposed medical experts who were actually paid actors. Esper would travel with the film from town to town, renting venues and splitting profits with local exhibitors, a practice common in exploitation cinema of the era.

Visual Style

The cinematography in Sex Madness is typical of low-budget exploitation films of the era, utilizing basic lighting setups and static camera positions to save time and money. The film employs high-contrast lighting in key dramatic scenes to create a sense of menace and moral decay. Medical scenes use close-ups to emphasize the supposed horrors of disease, while party scenes employ wider shots to suggest moral chaos. The visual style deliberately alternates between seemingly documentary-style footage and melodramatic compositions to enhance its educational claims while maintaining entertainment value. The film makes effective use of shadows and silhouettes, particularly in scenes suggesting illicit sexual encounters, working within censorship constraints while implying forbidden content.

Innovations

Sex Madness employed several technical innovations common to exploitation cinema of its era. The film used creative editing techniques to imply content that couldn't be shown directly due to censorship restrictions. It utilized stock footage and still photographs to extend its runtime without additional filming costs. The production pioneered certain marketing techniques, including the use of fake medical endorsements and sensational newspaper advertisements that would become standard in exploitation cinema. The film's distribution method through roadshow exhibitions demonstrated an alternative to traditional theater distribution that would influence independent filmmakers for decades.

Music

The film's soundtrack consists primarily of stock music and library cues, a common cost-saving measure in low-budget productions. The score includes dramatic orchestral pieces during moralizing sequences and jazz music during party scenes to suggest decadence and moral corruption. Sound effects are minimal but effective, with emphasis on medical equipment sounds to enhance the supposed educational aspects. The film uses silence strategically during key moral moments to emphasize their importance. Dialogue was likely post-dubbed, a common practice in Esper's productions that allowed for flexibility in editing and reduced production costs.

Famous Quotes

A single mistake can lead to a lifetime of suffering!
The wages of sin is death, but the wages of ignorance is eternal damnation!
In the big city, innocence is a currency that can be spent in one night!
Modern science has conquered many diseases, but the greatest cure is prevention!
Behind every pretty face lies a story that could break your heart!

Memorable Scenes

  • The scene where Linda receives her diagnosis, shot with dramatic shadows and close-ups to emphasize the horror and shame of her condition
  • The party sequence where Linda is seduced, using creative camera angles and shadows to suggest the sexual encounter without showing it explicitly
  • The medical consultation scene where Linda learns about her treatment options, featuring deliberately confusing medical jargon to create fear
  • The final moralizing sequence where the film's 'educational' message is delivered directly to the audience

Did You Know?

  • The film was also released under the alternative title 'Human Wreckage' in some markets to maximize its exploitation appeal
  • Director Dwain Esper was known as the 'King of Exploitation Cinema' and produced over 40 exploitation films between 1930-1950
  • The film was often shown in tent shows and rented halls rather than traditional theaters, part of the 'roadshow' exhibition circuit
  • Despite its educational claims, the film contained numerous medical inaccuracies and sensationalized depictions of syphilis treatment
  • The movie was frequently re-released throughout the 1940s and 1950s under different titles to trick audiences into seeing it again
  • Sex Madness was one of several films Esper made about venereal diseases, including 'The Seventh Sin' (1937)
  • The film's poster art was deliberately designed to be shocking and titillating while maintaining a veneer of educational purpose
  • Many cities attempted to ban the film, but Esper successfully fought most censorship attempts by claiming educational value
  • The actress playing Linda, Vivian McGill, appeared in several of Esper's films but never achieved mainstream success
  • The film was shot without sound recording and had dialogue and sound effects added later in post-production to save money

What Critics Said

Contemporary critics largely dismissed Sex Madness as exploitative trash, with mainstream newspapers refusing to review it. However, trade publications for independent exhibitors praised its commercial potential. Modern film historians recognize it as an important example of exploitation cinema that provides insight into 1930s social attitudes toward sexuality and disease. Critics today note that while the film claims educational purpose, it primarily functions as exploitation entertainment, using the veneer of public health to deliver sensational content. The film is often cited in studies of censorship and how filmmakers circumvented restrictions through clever marketing and distribution strategies.

What Audiences Thought

Sex Madness was commercially successful through its roadshow exhibition circuit, particularly in smaller towns and rural areas where it was often presented as an educational film. Audiences were drawn by the controversial subject matter and the film's promise of revealing taboo information about sexually transmitted diseases. Many viewers reported being shocked by the content, which was far more explicit than anything available in mainstream cinema. The film's success demonstrated a significant public appetite for content that addressed real-world issues, even when presented in a sensationalized manner. Despite its exploitation nature, some audience members reported that the film actually raised their awareness about venereal diseases, albeit through fear-based tactics.

Film Connections

Influenced By

  • Reefer Madness (1936)
  • The Seventh Sin (1937)
  • White Slave (1937)
  • Mad Youth (1938)
  • Tell Your Children (1936)

This Film Influenced

  • Mom and Dad (1945)
  • She Shoulda Said No! (1949)
  • The Story of Bob and Sally (1948)
  • The Street Corner (1948)

You Might Also Like

Reefer Madness (1936)Maniac (1934)The Devil's Daughter (1939)Child Bride (1938)The Road to Ruin (1934)

Film Restoration

Sex Madness survives in multiple film and video copies, though the original camera negative is likely lost. The film exists in various public domain releases of varying quality. Several archives, including the Library of Congress and the Academy Film Archive, hold copies of the film. The most complete versions run approximately 62 minutes, though truncated versions were also distributed. The film has been released on DVD and Blu-ray by various specialty labels specializing in exploitation cinema.

Themes & Topics

syphilisexploitationvenereal diseasebeauty queenNew York Citymedical dramacautionary talesexual educationmoral panic1930sindependent cinemaroadshow exhibition