The Departure of a Great Old Man

"A group of peasants comes to see Leo Tolstoy and his wife."

Keys: Space play/pause · ←/→ 10s · F fullscreen · M mute · </> speed

About this film

A group of peasants comes to see Leo Tolstoy and his wife, the Countess, to request some land. Tolstoy must explain to them that it is his wife who has authority over their land-holdings, and she will not help them. Stung by their negative reaction to him, Tolstoy becomes increasingly preoccupied with the problems of the poor.

Cast & crew

More about this film

About the production

Release dateOctober 1912
ProductionKhanzhonkov Film Company
Filmed inMoscow, Russia

This film was produced during the golden age of Russian silent cinema, shortly after Tolstoy's death in 1910, capitalizing on public interest in his life and controversial final years. The production faced the technical limitations of early cinema, requiring natural lighting and primitive camera equipment. The film was shot on location near Moscow to capture authentic Russian peasant life and aristocratic settings. Director Elizaveta Thiman was one of the few female directors working in Russian cinema during this period, bringing a unique perspective to this biographical drama.

Themes

Social justice and moral responsibilityConflict between personal conscience and social institutionsThe burden of fame and public expectationClass inequality and land reformMarital conflict and ideological differences

Themes & topics

Leo TolstoyRussian peasantsLand reformMoral conflictSocial injusticeMarital discordIntellectual crisisClass struggleMoral responsibilityRussian aristocracyPovertyConscienceSocial reform

Historical background

Production circa 1912 meant fixed cameras, intertitles or early sound rigs, and studio economies that shaped every scene in The Departure of a Great Old Man.

Why this film matters

Historians treat The Departure of a Great Old Man as evidence of what typical 1912 audiences could see in a program slot.

Making of

The production of this film occurred during a fascinating transitional period in Russian cinema, when filmmakers were beginning to explore more sophisticated narrative techniques and socially relevant themes. Director Elizaveta Thiman, working within the constraints of early cinema technology, employed innovative camera positioning and lighting to create emotional depth in the performances. The casting of Vladimir Shaternikov as Tolstoy was particularly significant, as his physical resemblance to the writer added authenticity to the portrayal. The film was shot in the actual style of Russian country estates of the period, with careful attention to historical accuracy in costumes and settings. The production team faced challenges in recreating the tense atmosphere between Tolstoy and his wife, requiring the actors to convey complex emotional conflicts through the limited means available in silent cinema. The film's focus on social issues reflected the growing political consciousness in Russian society and the film industry's willingness to address controversial subjects.

What critics said

Trade papers near 1912 listed The Departure of a Great Old Man as program material rather than headline art cinema.

Did you know?

  • This film was released just two years after Leo Tolstoy's actual death in 1910, making it one of the earliest cinematic portrayals of the famous writer
  • Director Elizaveta Thiman was a pioneering female filmmaker in the Russian Empire, one of very few women directing during this era
  • The film's title refers to Tolstoy's famous departure from his estate in his final days, a subject of great public controversy and speculation
  • Vladimir Shaternikov, who portrayed Tolstoy, was known for his physical resemblance to the writer and specialized in biographical roles
  • The production company, Khanzhonkov, was one of Russia's first major film studios and a pioneer in the Russian film industry
  • The film was considered controversial for its sympathetic portrayal of Tolstoy's conflicts with the Russian Orthodox Church and his support for peasant rights
  • Only a few fragments of this film are known to survive today, making it a rare example of early Russian biographical cinema
  • The film's release coincided with growing social tensions in Russia that would eventually lead to the 1917 revolutions
  • Olga Petrova-Zvantseva, who played the Countess, was a celebrated stage actress who made few film appearances, making this role particularly notable
  • The film was one of the first to dramatize the personal life of a living literary figure, setting a precedent for biographical films

Visual style

The cinematography of this early Russian film reflects the technical limitations and artistic ambitions of the period. The filmmakers used natural lighting and primitive camera equipment to create atmospheric scenes that conveyed the emotional weight of the story. The camera work was relatively static by modern standards, but showed careful composition and attention to visual storytelling. The film employed location shooting to capture authentic Russian landscapes and architectural details, adding to its historical authenticity. The cinematographer used close-ups sparingly but effectively to highlight emotional moments in the performances. The visual style emphasized the contrast between the opulent surroundings of the aristocratic characters and the humble conditions of the peasants. Despite the technical limitations of the era, the film's visual language successfully conveyed the social themes and emotional conflicts at the heart of the story.

Innovations

For its time, this film demonstrated several notable technical achievements in early Russian cinema. The production used location shooting to achieve greater authenticity in its portrayal of Russian peasant life and aristocratic settings. The filmmakers employed relatively sophisticated lighting techniques for the period, using natural light to create mood and atmosphere. The film's editing showed advanced understanding of narrative pacing and emotional rhythm for early cinema. The production design demonstrated careful attention to historical accuracy in costumes and props. The film's runtime of 45 minutes was relatively ambitious for the period, allowing for more complex character development and narrative depth. The sound recording techniques of the era were not used, as this was a silent production, but the film's visual storytelling techniques showed innovation in conveying complex emotions and social themes without dialogue.

Music

As a silent film, The Departure of a Great Old Man would have been accompanied by live musical performance during its original theatrical run. The musical accompaniment likely consisted of classical Russian music, possibly including works by composers like Tchaikovsky or Rachmaninoff, to enhance the emotional impact of the scenes. The musical score would have been carefully chosen to reflect the film's serious themes and emotional depth. In larger urban theaters, the accompaniment might have included a small orchestra, while smaller venues would have used a piano or organ. The music would have been particularly important during scenes of emotional conflict and moral struggle, helping to convey the internal states of the characters. The choice of music would have reflected the film's Russian cultural context and its serious artistic ambitions.

Famous quotes

The land is not mine to give, it belongs to her who holds the deeds, but the suffering of those who work it belongs to us all
I have written of justice, but now I see that words are not enough when bellies are empty and children cry
My conscience will not let me rest in comfort while others suffer in poverty
You call me a great man, but I am powerless to help those who need me most

Memorable scenes

  • The tense confrontation between Tolstoy and the peasants when he must explain his inability to help them obtain land
  • The emotional argument between Tolstoy and his wife over his growing concern for the poor and his neglect of their aristocratic lifestyle
  • The scene where Tolstoy walks through the peasant village, witnessing firsthand the poverty and suffering that haunts his conscience
  • The final melancholy sequence where Tolstoy sits alone, contemplating his inability to resolve the social injustices he has witnessed

What audiences thought

The film was well received by Russian audiences in 1912, who were still deeply affected by Tolstoy's recent death and interested in the circumstances of his final years. Many viewers appreciated the film's respectful treatment of Tolstoy's memory and its exploration of his social consciousness. The film's themes of social justice and moral responsibility resonated with audiences experiencing the growing social tensions of pre-revolutionary Russia. Some audience members were moved by the film's portrayal of Tolstoy's personal struggles and his commitment to helping the poor. The film's release sparked discussions about Tolstoy's legacy and his relevance to contemporary Russian society. Contemporary audience reactions, as documented in newspapers and magazines of the period, indicate that the film successfully captured the public's imagination and contributed to the ongoing cultural conversation about Tolstoy's place in Russian history.

Film connections

Influenced by

  • Tolstoy's actual writings on social justice and moral responsibility
  • Contemporary Russian literature addressing social issues
  • The real-life events of Tolstoy's final years and his departure from his estate
  • Russian theatrical traditions of serious drama
  • European biographical films of the early 1910s
  • The growing tradition of socially engaged Russian art

This film influenced

  • Later Russian films about literary figures
  • Soviet biographical films of the 1920s and 1930s
  • International films about Tolstoy's life
  • Russian films addressing social justice themes
  • Early Soviet cinema focusing on class conflict

Film restoration

The film is considered partially lost, with only fragments known to survive in Russian film archives. Some sequences have been preserved through the efforts of the Gosfilmofond, the Russian state film archive, but the complete film is not available in its original form. The surviving fragments provide valuable insight into early Russian cinema and the work of director Elizaveta Thiman. Restoration efforts have been ongoing, but the incomplete nature of the surviving material makes a full restoration impossible. The film's preservation status is typical of Russian cinema from this period, many of which were lost during the political upheavals of the early 20th century.

Where to watch

  • The surviving fragments are occasionally screened at specialized film archives and cinematheques, particularly at the Gosfilmofond in Moscow
  • Some excerpts may be available in academic collections and film history documentaries about early Russian cinema
  • The film is not commercially available on home video or streaming platforms due to its incomplete preservation status