Leaves from Satan's Book

Plot

Carl Theodor Dreyer's ambitious anthology film presents four distinct historical episodes, each demonstrating Satan's corrupting influence throughout human history. The film opens with Satan's temptation of Judas Iscariot, leading to the betrayal of Jesus Christ in ancient Jerusalem. The narrative then shifts to 16th-century Spain during the Spanish Inquisition, where Satan manipulates a monk into persecuting innocent people. The third segment takes place during the French Revolution, showing Satan's role in the chaos that leads to Marie Antoinette's execution. The final story occurs during the 1918 Finnish Civil War, where Satan continues his work of turning brother against brother, ultimately revealing that despite his temporary victories, God's love and forgiveness will ultimately prevail.

Historical Background

The film was produced in the aftermath of World War I and during a period of intense social upheaval in Europe. The recent Finnish Civil War (1918) depicted in the final segment was still fresh in people's minds, making its inclusion particularly daring. Denmark, though neutral during WWI, was experiencing its own social tensions and labor movements. The film's exploration of betrayal, persecution, and revolution resonated with contemporary audiences who had witnessed unprecedented global conflict and political change. The early 1920s also saw a rise in spiritualism and interest in the supernatural, making the film's themes particularly relevant. Dreyer's examination of evil's persistence throughout history reflected the widespread disillusionment following the war and the questioning of traditional moral certainties.

Making Of

The production of 'Leaves from Satan's Book' was a monumental undertaking for the Danish film industry in 1921. Director Carl Theodor Dreyer, only 33 years old at the time, was given unprecedented creative control and a substantial budget. The film required the construction of four distinct historical worlds, from ancient Jerusalem to revolutionary France. Dreyer worked closely with cinematographer George Schnéevoigt to develop innovative camera techniques, including complex tracking shots that were rare in silent cinema. The casting of Helge Nissen as Satan was a deliberate choice by Dreyer, who wanted a mature, dignified actor rather than a stereotypical villain. Nissen underwent extensive makeup transformations for each historical period. The Spanish Inquisition sequence proved particularly challenging to film, as Dreyer insisted on authentic torture chamber recreations that shocked some crew members. The French Revolution scenes involved hundreds of extras and required meticulous choreography to capture the chaos of the period.

Visual Style

The cinematography by George Schnéevoigt was revolutionary for its time, employing advanced techniques that would influence European cinema for years to come. Schnéevoigt used extensive tracking shots and mobile camera movements to create dynamic visual narratives, particularly in the crowd scenes during the French Revolution sequence. The film employed sophisticated lighting techniques to create dramatic contrasts between light and shadow, symbolizing the eternal struggle between good and evil. Each historical period was given a distinct visual aesthetic: the biblical sequences used soft, ethereal lighting; the Inquisition scenes featured harsh, stark contrasts; the Revolution segments utilized chaotic, handheld camera work; and the Finnish Civil War employed naturalistic, documentary-style photography. The film's visual vocabulary helped establish Dreyer's signature style of using composition and lighting to convey psychological and spiritual states.

Innovations

The film pioneered several technical innovations that would influence cinema for decades. Dreyer and his team developed advanced techniques for historical reconstruction, creating detailed period sets that set new standards for authenticity in historical films. The production employed sophisticated makeup and prosthetic techniques to age Helge Nissen appropriately for each historical period. The film's use of cross-cutting between different time periods to create thematic parallels was groundbreaking and influenced later epic films. The crowd scenes in the French Revolution segment featured some of the most complex choreography and staging of the era, requiring coordination of hundreds of extras. The film's preservation and restoration in the 1980s also pioneered new techniques for reconstructing damaged silent films from multiple sources.

Music

As a silent film, 'Leaves from Satan's Book' would have been accompanied by live musical performance during its original theatrical run. The score would have varied by theater and location, typically featuring a combination of classical pieces and original compositions. For the film's restoration and modern screenings, various composers have created new scores, including notable versions by Gillian B. Anderson and Timothy Brock. The original Danish premiere likely featured orchestral accompaniment with pieces ranging from Gregorian chants for the biblical sequences to dramatic Romantic compositions for the revolutionary scenes. The film's rhythmic editing and visual pacing suggest careful consideration of musical accompaniment during its creation.

Memorable Scenes

• The Last Supper sequence where Satan tempts Judas with silver, using innovative lighting to create an otherworldly atmosphere
• The Spanish Inquisition torture chamber scenes, which were shockingly realistic for their time
• The storming of the Bastille sequence with hundreds of extras and dynamic camera movement
• The final confrontation between Satan and the divine presence, where Dreyer used double exposure techniques to create a spiritual effect
• The transition scenes between episodes, where Satan transforms to match each historical period

What Critics Said

Upon its initial release, critical reception was mixed but generally respectful of the film's artistic ambitions. Danish critics praised Dreyer's technical achievements and the film's bold thematic scope, though some found the running length excessive. International critics were impressed by the film's visual style and innovative storytelling techniques, though the religious themes proved controversial in some markets. Contemporary film historians and critics have reevaluated the film as a masterpiece of silent cinema, particularly praising Dreyer's sophisticated visual language and the film's influence on subsequent historical epics. The film is now recognized as a crucial step in Dreyer's development toward his later masterpieces like 'The Passion of Joan of Arc' (1928) and 'Day of Wrath' (1943).

What Audiences Thought

The film was not a commercial success upon its initial release, largely due to its length and challenging themes. Danish audiences found the film's religious content and historical scope demanding compared to more conventional entertainment of the era. However, the film developed a cult following among intellectuals and cinema enthusiasts who appreciated its artistic merits. The Finnish Civil War segment proved particularly divisive among Finnish audiences, given the recent and painful nature of those events. In subsequent decades, as the film was rediscovered and restored, it has found appreciation among art house audiences and film students who recognize its historical importance and artistic achievements.

You Might Also Like