
In this 1913 Russian comedy adaptation of Pushkin's story, young Parasha lives with her widowed mother in Kolomna, dutifully managing household chores while flirting with passing guards officers, particularly favoring one handsome suitor. When her mother instructs her to hire a cook as cheaply as possible, Parasha and her beloved officer devise a clever scheme to use this domestic necessity to their romantic advantage. The plot unfolds with comedic misunderstandings as the couple attempts to conceal their true intentions while navigating the constraints of early 20th century Russian society. Their ruse involves disguises and role-playing that highlight the film's exploration of social class and gender roles. The story culminates in a resolution that both satisfies the young lovers' desires and maintains the appearance of propriety demanded by the era's social conventions.

The film was produced by Alexander Khanzhonkov's company, one of Russia's first major film studios. As an early Russian production, it was made during the peak of pre-revolutionary Russian cinema when the country was producing some of the most sophisticated films in the world. The production utilized the relatively new technology of cinema while adapting classic Russian literature, a common practice that helped legitimize film as an art form in Russian society.
The film was produced in 1913, just four years before the Russian Revolution would dramatically transform the country. This period saw tremendous cultural flowering in Russia, with cinema emerging as a new and exciting art form. The Russian Empire was experiencing rapid industrialization and urbanization, creating new social tensions that are reflected in the film's themes of class and social mobility. Cinema was still a relatively new medium, but Russian filmmakers were already developing sophisticated techniques and approaches that would influence world cinema. The adaptation of Pushkin, Russia's most revered literary figure, into film represented an important step in cinema's acceptance as legitimate art in Russian culture. The year 1913 also marked the 300th anniversary of the Romanov dynasty, a time of both celebration and underlying social unrest that would soon erupt into revolution.
This film represents an important milestone in early Russian cinema's development, demonstrating how filmmakers were adapting the nation's rich literary heritage to the new medium of film. The choice of Pushkin's work reflects the cultural aspiration of early Russian cinema to align itself with the high arts rather than being seen merely as popular entertainment. The film's focus on social satire and romantic comedy helped establish genres that would remain popular throughout Russian and Soviet cinema history. As one of the works that launched Ivan Mosjoukine to stardom, it contributed to the development of the star system in Russian cinema. The film also exemplifies the pre-revolutionary Russian film industry's sophistication, which was tragically disrupted by the political upheavals of 1917, leading to the loss of many works from this era.
The production of 'The Little House in Kolomna' took place during the golden age of pre-revolutionary Russian cinema, when the Khanzhonkov Company was at its peak. Director Pyotr Chardynin, who had a background in theater, brought theatrical techniques to his film work, emphasizing character development and emotional expression despite the limitations of silent cinema. Ivan Mosjoukine, already becoming a major star, was known for his intense acting style that could convey complex emotions through facial expressions and body language alone. The film's production would have used natural lighting and relatively simple sets, typical of the era, but with growing attention to visual composition and atmosphere. The adaptation process from Pushkin's satirical poem to a visual medium required significant creative decisions about how to translate the literary irony and social commentary into cinematic form.
The cinematography of this 1913 production would have utilized the techniques common to early Russian cinema, which were becoming increasingly sophisticated. The film likely employed static camera positions typical of the era, but with careful attention to composition and lighting to create atmosphere and highlight the actors' performances. Early Russian cinematographers were known for their artistic sensibility, often creating visually striking images despite the technical limitations of the period. The use of natural lighting and carefully designed sets would have helped create the appropriate period atmosphere for the 19th-century setting. The visual style would have emphasized the actors' facial expressions and body language, crucial for conveying emotion and story in silent cinema.
While 'The Little House in Kolomna' does not appear to have introduced major technical innovations, it represents the technical standards of early Russian cinema at its peak. The film would have been shot on 35mm film stock using hand-cranked cameras, requiring careful coordination between camera operator and actors. The production likely used artificial lighting techniques that were becoming more sophisticated in 1913, allowing for greater control over image quality and mood. The editing would have employed basic continuity cutting to advance the narrative, a technique that was still being refined during this period. The film's preservation of Pushkin's satirical tone in visual form demonstrates an early mastery of cinematic storytelling techniques that could convey literary irony without dialogue.
As a silent film, 'The Little House in Kolomna' would have been accompanied by live music during theatrical screenings. The specific musical score is not documented, but typical accompaniment for Russian films of this era would have included popular classical pieces, folk melodies, and improvised music performed on piano or small theater orchestra. The music would have been synchronized to enhance the emotional impact of scenes, with faster tempos for comedic moments and romantic themes for love scenes. The choice of music would likely have reflected the film's literary origins, possibly incorporating works by Russian composers to maintain cultural authenticity. The live musical performance was an integral part of the cinematic experience in this era, with skilled musicians often improvising based on the action on screen.
In the little house in Kolomna, lived a widow with her daughter Parasha
Parasha was not lazy by nature, but young and flirtatious
The officers passing by the window would often stop to exchange glances
Hire a cook, but as cheaply as possible - the mother's practical instruction
Love finds a way, even through the mundane tasks of daily life
Contemporary critical reception of the film is difficult to document due to the passage of time and the loss of many periodicals from the era. However, films from the Khanzhonkov Company starring Ivan Mosjoukine were generally well-received by Russian audiences and critics of the time. Modern film historians consider this work significant as an example of early Russian cinema's literary adaptations and its contribution to the development of film comedy. The film is often cited in studies of pre-revolutionary Russian cinema as representative of the industry's artistic ambitions and technical capabilities. Film scholars note that while the film may seem simple by modern standards, it was quite sophisticated for its time in its approach to narrative and character development.
Contemporary audience reception is not well documented, but films featuring Ivan Mosjoukine were popular with Russian cinema-goers of the period. The adaptation of a familiar Pushkin story would have made the film accessible and appealing to educated Russian audiences. The comedy elements and romantic storyline would have provided entertainment value while the literary source material gave it cultural legitimacy. Early Russian cinema audiences were largely urban and middle to upper class, and films like this one catered to their tastes for sophisticated entertainment that reflected their cultural values. The film's themes of social maneuvering and romantic deception would have resonated with audiences navigating the rapidly changing social landscape of pre-revolutionary Russia.
The preservation status of 'The Little House in Kolomna' (1913) is uncertain, which is unfortunately common for films from this era of Russian cinema. Many pre-revolutionary Russian films were lost due to the political upheavals following 1917, neglect during the Soviet era, or the deterioration of nitrate film stock. Some fragments or copies may exist in Russian film archives such as Gosfilmofond, but complete versions of many films from this period are rare. The film's survival would depend on whether copies were exported internationally or preserved in private collections. Film historians continue to search for lost Russian films in archives worldwide, and discoveries are occasionally made, so there remains hope that this film or portions of it may yet be found.