Do Detectives Think?

"Two bungling guards protect a marked judge"

Keys: Space play/pause · ←/→ 10s · F fullscreen · M mute · </> speed

About this film

An escaped convict is out to kill the judge who sentenced him. Two inept detectives are hired to guard the judge.

Cast & crew

More about this film

About the production

Release dateSeptember 3, 1927
Box officeNot individually tracked - shorts were rented to theaters as part of programs
ProductionHal Roach Studios, Pathé Exchange (distributor)
Filmed inHal Roach Studios, Culver City, California, USA

Filmed in early summer 1927 over approximately 4-6 days. The mansion set was reused from previous Hal Roach productions. The film was one of many Laurel and Hardy shorts produced during their peak output year of 1927. Director Fred Guiol was instrumental in developing the team's on-screen chemistry and would direct several of their early classics.

Themes

Incompetence and professional failureJustice and revengeAuthority and its abuseProtection and vulnerabilityMistaken identity

Themes & topics

escaped convictprivate detectivesrevenge plotmansionjudgeprotectionmistaken identityphysical comedysilent filmcomedy duoincompetencebreak-indisguisechasefarce

Historical background

Made in 1927, Do Detectives Think? reflects production norms of late silent cinema and the transition toward sound—shorter runtimes, regional audiences, and limited preservation infrastructure.

Why this film matters

Historians reference Do Detectives Think? (1927) when discussing 1927 film by Fred Guiol.

Making of

The production of 'Do Detectives Think?' took place during a remarkably creative period at Hal Roach Studios, where the comedy factory was churning out shorts at an incredible pace. Director Fred Guiol, who had a keen eye for comedic timing, worked closely with Laurel and Hardy to develop their on-screen personas. The physical comedy sequences were carefully choreographed, with Stan Laurel often contributing ideas for gags based on his music hall background. Oliver Hardy, with his background in silent film acting, helped refine the visual storytelling. The film's production was typical of the era - fast, efficient, and focused on delivering maximum laughs in minimal time. The cast and crew worked long hours to complete the film in just a few days, a schedule that would be unheard of in later years. The mansion set was dressed specifically for this production but was designed to be easily adaptable for future films, demonstrating the studio's economical approach to production.

What critics said

Modern write-ups on Do Detectives Think? (1927) tend to focus on preservation status, stylistic choices, and placement within director or studio filmographies.

Did you know?

  • This was one of over 20 films Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy made together in 1927 alone, showing their incredible productivity during this period.
  • The title 'Do Detectives Think?' is a rhetorical question that perfectly encapsulates the film's premise and the duo's incompetence.
  • James Finlayson, who plays the judge, would become among the leading frequently recurring supporting actors in Laurel and Hardy films, appearing in 33 of their movies.
  • The film was released just two months before 'The Jazz Singer' revolutionized cinema with sound, making it part of the last great wave of silent comedy shorts.
  • The escaped convict character, played by Noah Young, was a regular heavy in Hal Roach productions due to his imposing 6'3" stature.
  • This film represents an early stage in Laurel and Hardy's character development - they're not yet the fully-formed characters they would become by 1929.
  • The mansion set used in the film was so frequently reused in Hal Roach productions that it became known as 'the Roach mansion' among crew members.
  • Physical comedy sequences required multiple takes as the team perfected their timing and gags, a process that would become their trademark.
  • The film's intertitles were written by H.M. Walker, who wrote most of the title cards for Hal Roach comedies during this period.
  • Modern preservation efforts have restored the film with new musical scores, as original theater organ accompaniment was never recorded.

Visual style

The cinematography by George Stevens (who would later become a renowned director) employs the straightforward but effective visual style typical of Hal Roach comedies. Wide shots are used extensively to capture the physical comedy and allow audiences to see the full scope of the gags, particularly in the mansion sequences where multiple characters interact. Medium shots focus on character reactions and expressions, crucial in silent comedy for conveying emotion and humor. The lighting is bright and even, ensuring clear visibility of the action, a practical necessity for comedy films of this era. The camera work is functional rather than artistic, prioritizing clarity and timing over visual experimentation. The film makes effective use of the mansion set's various spaces - stairs, doors, and rooms - to create comedic situations through spatial relationships and movement patterns that would become hallmarks of Laurel and Hardy's visual style.

Innovations

While 'Do Detectives Think?' doesn't feature groundbreaking technical innovations, it demonstrates the high level of craftsmanship achieved in Hollywood comedy production by 1927. The film showcases sophisticated gag construction and timing, with physical comedy sequences that require precise coordination between performers, camera, and set elements. The use of the mansion set for multiple comedic situations demonstrates efficient production design and spatial planning. The film's editing, while conventional for its time, effectively paces the gags and maintains comedic momentum throughout its 20-minute runtime. The intertitles by H.M. Walker represent the refined art of silent film writing, conveying necessary information and humor with minimal text. The film also demonstrates the technical proficiency of Hal Roach Studios in producing high-quality comedy shorts on tight schedules and budgets, a capability that made the studio especially successful comedy producers of the silent era.

Music

As a silent film, 'Do Detectives Think?' had no original soundtrack or recorded music. During its theatrical run, it would have been accompanied by live music, typically a theater organist or small orchestra who would select appropriate pieces to match the on-screen action. The accompaniment would have included popular songs of the era, classical pieces, and specially composed mood music. Modern releases and restorations of the film feature newly recorded musical scores, often composed by silent film specialists who create period-appropriate accompaniment using authentic instrumentation and styles. These modern scores typically include jaunty ragtime pieces for comedic moments, suspenseful music for the threat sequences, and romantic themes when appropriate. The absence of dialogue places greater emphasis on the musical accompaniment to set tone and enhance the visual comedy, a challenge that modern composers approach with respect for both the film's era and contemporary audience expectations.

Famous quotes

Intertitle: 'Two of the greatest detectives in the world - and they don't even know it!'
Intertitle: 'We're here to protect you, Judge - from everybody including ourselves!'
Intertitle: 'The Tipton Slasher has escaped!'
Intertitle: 'Don't worry, Judge - we're professionals!'
Intertitle: 'I've got a feeling we're in for trouble!'
Intertitle: 'This detective business is getting dangerous!'
Intertitle: 'Somebody's trying to get in!'
Intertitle: 'Quick, hide!'

Memorable scenes

  • The opening sequence where Laurel and Hardy receive their detective assignments, showcasing their immediate incompetence as they struggle to understand their basic duties.
  • The scene where the detectives attempt to secure the mansion by boarding up windows, only to trap themselves inside with the escaped convict.
  • The classic staircase sequence where multiple characters chase each other up and down the stairs, creating escalating chaos and physical comedy.
  • The climactic confrontation where Laurel and Hardy accidentally capture the escaped convict while trying to escape themselves, demonstrating their signature 'success through failure' formula.
  • The disguise sequence where the detectives attempt to go undercover, resulting in ridiculous costumes that make them more conspicuous rather than less.

What audiences thought

Contemporary audiences responded positively to 'Do Detectives Think?' as part of theater programs, with Laurel and Hardy's growing popularity evident in the increasing demand for films featuring the duo. Moviegoers of the silent era appreciated the film's straightforward humor, physical comedy, and the relatable theme of incompetent professionals trying (and failing) to do their jobs. The film's release during the peak of silent comedy attendance meant it reached a wide audience, contributing to the team's rising stardom. Modern audiences encountering the film through revivals, film festivals, and home media continue to find entertainment in its timeless humor and the charm of Laurel and Hardy's early work. The film's accessibility as a silent comedy with universal visual gags has helped it maintain appeal across generations and cultures, demonstrating the enduring power of well-crafted physical comedy.

Film connections

Influenced by

  • Earlier comedy duos such as Abbott and Costello's predecessors
  • The tradition of Mack Sennett's Keystone comedies
  • Charlie Chaplin's character-based comedy
  • Buster Keaton's technical precision in gags
  • Harold Lloyd's everyman comedy style
  • Music hall and vaudeville traditions
  • The general tradition of silent comedy shorts

This film influenced

  • Later Laurel and Hardy films that refined the detective theme
  • The Sons of the Desert (1933)
  • Our Relations (1936)
  • Way Out West (1937)
  • The influence on later comedy detective films
  • Inspiration for television comedy duos
  • Modern physical comedy films

Film restoration

The film survives in complete form and has been preserved by various film archives including the Library of Congress and the UCLA Film and Television Archive. Multiple 16mm and 35mm prints exist, and the film has been digitally restored for home video releases. The preservation quality is generally good, though some wear is evident in certain prints, typical of films from this era that went through multiple distribution cycles. The film entered the public domain in the United States, which has contributed to its widespread availability but also to the circulation of varying quality copies. Restoration efforts have cleaned up image quality and added appropriate musical scores for modern audiences.

Where to watch

  • The film is included in various Laurel and Hardy DVD collections from distributors like Kino Lorber and The Criterion Collection
  • Available on streaming services specializing in classic films such as The Criterion Channel
  • Public domain versions can be found on YouTube and Internet Archive
  • Included in the 'Laurel and Hardy: The Essential Collection' DVD box set
  • Available for digital purchase or rental on Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV
  • Sometimes aired on classic movie television channels like TCM (Turner Classic Movies)
  • Part of the streaming library on Kanopy (available through participating libraries and universities)