
Zoya Verenskaya has lived as a devoted widow for ten years, dedicating her life entirely to her daughter Lee's care. Lee suffers from poor health and faces the devastating possibility of losing her eyesight, causing Zoya to postpone any thoughts of personal happiness. When Zoya's suitor Dmitry proposes marriage, she refuses, insisting she must wait until her daughter's condition improves. The three travel to Crimea for a therapeutic vacation, hoping the climate will help Lee's health. However, during this trip, they discover Lee's deep romantic feelings for Dmitry, shattering their carefully constructed family dynamic and throwing all their lives into emotional turmoil as they confront complex questions of love, sacrifice, and personal happiness.
This was one of Yevgeni Bauer's final completed films before his death in June 1917. The film was produced during the chaotic period of the Russian Revolution, which severely impacted film production. Bauer was known for his sophisticated visual style and psychological depth, and this film showcases his mastery of complex emotional narratives. The production faced significant challenges due to the political upheaval and resource shortages occurring in Russia during 1917.
For Happiness was produced and released during one of the most tumultuous years in Russian history - 1917, the year of both the February and October Revolutions. The film emerged from the golden age of Russian cinema (1913-1917), when the Russian Empire had one of the world's most sophisticated and productive film industries. Director Yevgeni Bauer was at the height of his career during this period, creating psychologically complex dramas that rivaled the best of European cinema. The revolution would soon transform Russian cinema completely, with many pre-revolutionary films being suppressed or destroyed and many filmmakers fleeing the country. This film therefore represents one of the last examples of pre-revolutionary Russian artistic cinema at its peak, created just before the Soviet system would radically reshape film production and content.
For Happiness stands as a significant example of the psychological sophistication achieved in Russian cinema before the Soviet era. Yevgeni Bauer's work, including this film, demonstrated that Russian filmmakers had developed a unique cinematic language that emphasized psychological depth and visual elegance. The film's exploration of complex family dynamics, sacrifice, and romantic tension represented mature themes rarely addressed with such nuance in cinema of this period. Bauer's influence on later Russian and international cinema has been increasingly recognized by film historians, who see him as a pioneer of cinematic psychological realism. The preservation of this film allows modern audiences to appreciate the artistic achievements of pre-revolutionary Russian cinema, which was largely unknown in the West for decades due to political isolation.
Yevgeni Bauer approached this film with his signature psychological sophistication, using subtle visual cues and framing to convey the complex emotional states of his characters. The production utilized both studio sets in Moscow and location filming in Crimea, which was unusual for Russian cinema of the period. Bauer worked closely with his cinematographer to create the film's distinctive visual atmosphere, employing innovative camera movements and lighting techniques that were ahead of their time. The casting of Nikolai Radin, Lidiya Koreneva, and Tasya Borman represented some of the finest actors in Russian cinema, all of whom had worked extensively with Bauer before. The film was completed just as the Russian Revolution was reaching its climax, creating enormous challenges for the production team and affecting the film's eventual release and distribution.
The cinematography in For Happiness showcases Yevgeni Bauer's characteristic visual sophistication, employing innovative camera techniques and lighting that were advanced for their time. The film features carefully composed shots that use depth and framing to enhance the psychological drama, with Bauer often positioning characters to visually represent their emotional states and relationships. The Crimean location sequences demonstrate a more naturalistic visual style compared to the controlled studio scenes, creating a contrast between the characters' confined emotional world and the freedom of the natural landscape. The film's visual language includes subtle camera movements and lighting effects that convey mood and psychological tension, techniques that would not become common in cinema for many years.
For Happiness demonstrates several technical innovations that were ahead of their time in 1917 cinema. Bauer's use of sophisticated camera movement, including tracking shots and carefully choreographed camera positions, created a fluid visual style that enhanced the psychological drama. The film's lighting techniques, particularly in interior scenes, show advanced understanding of how light and shadow could be used to convey emotional states. The combination of studio and location filming was technically challenging for the period and required considerable logistical planning. Bauer's mise-en-scène demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of visual storytelling, using composition and framing to reveal character relationships and psychological states without relying on intertitles.
As a silent film, For Happiness would have been accompanied by live musical performance during its original theatrical run. The typical accompaniment would have been provided by a theater organist or small ensemble playing appropriate mood music to enhance the emotional content of each scene. While no specific score information survives from the film's original release, contemporary screenings are often accompanied by newly composed scores or period-appropriate classical music. The film's emotional complexity would have required skilled musical accompaniment to properly convey the psychological nuances of the story.
(As a silent film, quotes are conveyed through intertitles and visual narrative rather than spoken dialogue)
Contemporary Russian critics praised Bauer's sophisticated direction and the film's psychological depth, with particular appreciation for its nuanced handling of complex emotional themes. The film was noted for its visual elegance and the strong performances of its lead actors. In the decades following the revolution, Bauer's work was largely overlooked in Soviet film criticism due to its pre-revolutionary origins and bourgeois themes. However, since the late 20th century, international film historians and critics have rediscovered Bauer's work, with For Happiness being recognized as a significant achievement in early cinematic art. Modern critics particularly praise the film's mature treatment of psychological themes and its visual sophistication, considering it ahead of its time in many respects.
The film was well-received by Russian audiences in 1917, who appreciated Bauer's reputation for quality filmmaking and the strong performances of the popular cast. However, its release during the chaotic period of the October Revolution limited its commercial success and distribution. In subsequent decades, the film was largely inaccessible to audiences both within and outside Russia due to political and preservation issues. Since its restoration and inclusion in international film retrospectives, modern audiences have responded positively to the film's emotional depth and technical artistry, with many expressing surprise at the sophistication of pre-revolutionary Russian cinema.
The film has been preserved through the efforts of the Gosfilmofond Russian State Archive of Film and Photo Documents in Moscow. While many films from this era are completely lost, For Happiness survives in a viewable condition, though some deterioration is evident. The film has been restored and included in various retrospectives of early Russian cinema and Yevgeni Bauer's work, allowing modern audiences to appreciate this significant example of pre-revolutionary Russian film art.