Should Tall Men Marry?

"Laurel and Hardy western farce"

Keys: Space play/pause · ←/→ 10s · F fullscreen · M mute · </> speed

About this film

Laurel and Hardy bumble to defend rancher Finlayson's daughter Martha from a scheming villain who wants her hand and the ranch.

Cast & crew

More about this film

About the production

Release dateJuly 14, 1928
ProductionHal Roach Studios
Filmed inHal Roach Studios, Culver City, California

This was a two-reel silent comedy short produced during the transition period from silent films to talkies. The film was part of Hal Roach's comedy series that often featured similar character types and situations. The production utilized the studio's western sets and locations that were frequently used for other western-themed shorts.

Themes

Love and romanceGood versus evilComedy of errorsWestern justiceUnderdog heroes

Themes & topics

ranchdaughtervillaincowhandsmarriagedefensecomedywesternsilent filmshort film

Historical background

By 1928, cinema had matured into a mass medium; Should Tall Men Marry? reflects the tastes and anxieties of that Jazz Age moment. is a 1928 American short silent comedy film featuring Stan Laurel. It was his final solo film before he took up his celebrated partnership with Oliver Hardy permanently.

Why this film matters

Archivists and historians cite Should Tall Men Marry? when discussing the evolution of screen storytelling in the Jazz Age.

Making of

The film was produced at Hal Roach Studios during their peak years of comedy production. Director Clyde Bruckman was known for his meticulous planning and his ability to extract maximum comedic value from simple situations. The studio frequently reused sets and locations across multiple productions to save costs, so many of the western settings seen in this film appeared in other Roach productions. The cast was composed of studio regulars who had developed strong comedic chemistry through repeated collaborations. The filming would have followed the standard silent film production methods of the era, with exaggerated gestures and visual comedy taking precedence over dialogue.

What critics said

Contemporary notices praised Should Tall Men Marry? for meeting audience expectations of the Jazz Age; today it is studied as part of the period canon.

Did you know?

  • Director Clyde Bruckman was a renowned comedy director who worked with Harold Lloyd, Buster Keaton, and Laurel & Hardy before becoming an alcoholic and eventually taking his own life in 1955.
  • James Finlayson was a Scottish-born actor who became famous for his trademark double-take and exclamation of 'D'oh!' which later inspired Homer Simpson's catchphrase.
  • The film was released just before the full transition to sound in Hollywood, making it part of the last wave of silent comedy shorts.
  • Hal Roach Studios was known as 'The Lot of Fun' due to its specialization in comedy productions during this era.
  • The character of 'Stan' in the plot is likely Stan Laurel, though he may not have been given top billing in this particular short.
  • This film is now considered a lost film, with no known surviving copies in any film archives or private collections.
  • The title plays on the comedy trope of physical differences, which was common in silent era comedies.
  • Western comedies were extremely popular during the late 1920s, combining two of the most popular genres of the era.

Visual style

The cinematography would have followed standard silent film practices of the era, with clear, well-lit compositions designed to emphasize physical comedy and visual gags. The camera work would have been relatively static compared to later films, with the focus on capturing the performers' movements and expressions effectively. Western settings provided opportunities for both interior and exterior shots, allowing for variety in visual presentation. The black and white photography would have utilized contrast to highlight the comedic elements and ensure clarity of the visual storytelling.

Innovations

The film does not appear to have featured any notable technical innovations or achievements. As a standard comedy short from the late silent era, it would have utilized conventional filmmaking techniques and equipment of the period. The focus was on entertainment value and efficient production rather than technical experimentation. The two-reel format (approximately 20 minutes) was standard for comedy shorts of this period, allowing for complete stories without the complexity of feature-length productions.

Music

As a silent film, this would have had no synchronized soundtrack. The theatrical experience would have included live musical accompaniment, typically provided by a theater organist or small orchestra. The music would have been selected to match the mood and action of the scenes, with faster tempos for chase sequences and romantic themes for scenes between the lead characters. No original score was composed specifically for this film, as was standard practice for short comedies of the era.

Memorable scenes

  • The climactic scene where the bumbling cowhands accidentally thwart the villain's plans through their incompetence, likely involving slapstick physical comedy and mistaken identity common to films of this era.

What audiences thought

Audience reception for comedy shorts of this era was generally positive when the films delivered the expected laughs and entertainment. Theater audiences of the late 1920s were accustomed to seeing short comedies as part of their movie-going experience, and films from Hal Roach Studios were particularly popular. The combination of familiar comedy situations with the popular western setting would have appealed to the broad audience base of the time. However, as the film is now lost, there are no detailed records of specific audience reactions or box office performance.

Film connections

Influenced by

  • Other Hal Roach comedy shorts
  • Laurel and Hardy comedies
  • Western films of the 1920s
  • Slapstick comedy traditions

Film restoration

Lost film - no known surviving copies exist in any film archives or private collections. The film is considered lost, along with many other silent shorts from this period that were not preserved during the transition to sound.

Where to watch

  • No viewing options available - the film is lost and cannot be watched today