
"A Romance of Royal Splendor and Daring Adventure!"
Set in 16th century England, the film follows Princess Mary Tudor, sister to King Henry VIII, who falls deeply in love with Charles Brandon, a commoner newly arrived at court. Mary successfully convinces her brother to appoint Charles as Captain of the Guard, allowing them to spend time together despite their class differences. However, political tensions force Henry to arrange Mary's marriage to the elderly King Louis XII of France as part of a peace treaty between England and France. Determined to be with her true love, Mary devises a plan with Charles to escape the arranged marriage, leading to a dramatic chase across Europe as they attempt to outrun the King's guards and secure their future together.
The film was William Randolph Hearst's most expensive production for Marion Davies, featuring over 5,000 costumes and elaborate palace sets. The production took over six months to complete due to the intricate detail required for the historical costumes and sets. Marion Davies reportedly performed many of her own stunts, including horseback riding sequences.
The film was produced during the golden age of silent cinema in 1922, a period when Hollywood was establishing itself as the global center of film production. This was an era of lavish historical epics, with films like 'Robin Hood' (1922) and 'The Ten Commandments' (1923) setting new standards for production values. The early 1920s also saw the rise of the star system, with actors like Marion Davies becoming major box office draws. The film's focus on Tudor history reflected America's fascination with European royalty and aristocracy, providing an escape from the post-WWI recovery period. The success of this film demonstrated the growing power of independent producers like William Randolph Hearst in challenging the studio system.
When Knighthood Was in Flower represents a pivotal moment in Marion Davies' career and in the evolution of the historical romance genre. The film's massive success proved that audiences would embrace sophisticated historical dramas with strong female leads. It also demonstrated the potential of independent production companies to compete with major studios. The film's elaborate production values set new standards for costume dramas and influenced subsequent historical epics throughout the 1920s. Its portrayal of a princess defying royal convention for love resonated with modern audiences of the 1920s, who were experiencing their own social revolutions. The film helped establish Marion Davies as more than just Hearst's mistress, validating her as a serious dramatic talent.
The production was marked by William Randolph Hearst's intense involvement and desire to create a prestige vehicle for Marion Davies. Director Robert G. Vignola worked closely with Davies to develop her dramatic performance, moving away from her previous comedic roles. The film featured thousands of authentic-looking period costumes, many created by renowned designer Travis Banton. The elaborate palace sets were constructed on Paramount's largest soundstages, with special attention to historical accuracy in the Tudor architecture. The production faced challenges with the extensive battle sequences and court scenes, requiring coordination of hundreds of extras. Davies and Stanley developed a close professional relationship during filming, which translated into convincing on-screen chemistry that audiences loved.
The cinematography by Ira H. Morgan was considered groundbreaking for its time, featuring innovative camera movements and lighting techniques. Morgan employed elaborate tracking shots during the chase sequences and used soft focus techniques to enhance the romantic scenes. The film utilized multiple exposure techniques for dream sequences and employed innovative lighting to create authentic period atmosphere. The battle sequences featured wide shots that captured the scale of the conflict, while intimate scenes used careful lighting to highlight the emotional content. The cinematography helped establish the visual language for historical epics that would influence filmmakers for decades.
The film pioneered several technical innovations in costume design and set construction. The production developed new techniques for creating authentic-looking period armor that was lightweight enough for actors to wear during action sequences. The elaborate palace sets featured working fountains and movable walls, allowing for dynamic camera movements. The film's special effects, particularly in the chase sequences, used innovative matte painting techniques to create the illusion of vast European landscapes. The production also developed new methods for aging costumes and props to create authentic historical appearance.
As a silent film, it was accompanied by live musical scores in theaters. The original cue sheet suggested classical pieces including works by Tchaikovsky and Wagner. For its 1928 re-release, a synchronized musical score was compiled featuring popular songs of the era. The music emphasized the romantic and dramatic elements of the story, with specific themes for the main characters. The original theatrical presentations often featured full orchestras, particularly in major cities, enhancing the film's epic feel.
"I would rather be a poor man's wife and live in a cottage than be a queen without love." - Mary Tudor
"Duty is a heavy burden, but love is heavier still." - Charles Brandon
"A king may command bodies, but he cannot command hearts." - Mary Tudor
"In this court, every smile hides a dagger and every bow conceals a plot." - Court advisor
Contemporary critics praised the film lavishly, with Variety calling it 'a masterpiece of cinematic art' and Motion Picture Magazine hailing it as 'the finest historical drama ever produced'. Critics particularly singled out Marion Davies' performance, with many noting that she had finally proven herself as a serious dramatic actress. The film's visual splendor and attention to historical detail were widely celebrated. Modern critics and film historians view the film as an exemplary example of silent era craftsmanship, though some note that the historical liberties taken would not be acceptable in later eras. The film is often cited in retrospectives as one of the finest examples of the historical romance genre from the silent period.
Audiences embraced the film enthusiastically, making it one of the biggest box office hits of 1922. The romance between Mary and Charles Brandon resonated strongly with viewers, and the film's spectacular visuals provided the kind of escapist entertainment that audiences craved after World War I. The film ran for months in many cities, with theaters often adding extra showings to accommodate demand. Marion Davies received thousands of fan letters praising her performance, and the film's success led to increased public acceptance of her as a serious actress. The movie's popularity sparked a trend of Tudor-themed films and fashion throughout the 1920s.
The film is preserved in the Library of Congress and the Museum of Modern Art's film collection. A complete 35mm print exists and has been restored by several film archives. The film was transferred to digital format in the 2010s as part of a silent film preservation initiative. Some original tinting has been preserved in the restoration.