Wives Under Suspicion

Plot

District Attorney Stephen 'Steve' de Lorca is a merciless prosecutor known for his tough stance on crime, particularly in cases involving domestic violence. When he takes on the case of a man accused of murdering his wife for alleged infidelity, Steve finds the proceedings hitting uncomfortably close to home as he becomes increasingly suspicious of his own beautiful wife Lucy's faithfulness. His jealousy intensifies as he observes her interactions with his young, handsome assistant, leading him down a dark path of paranoia and rage. The legal drama becomes a psychological thriller as Steve's professional life and personal demons collide, forcing him to confront the hypocrisy of his own actions while prosecuting a man for a crime he himself is contemplating. In a dramatic courtroom climax, Steve must face the truth about his own marriage and the destructive nature of unfounded suspicion.

Historical Background

Released in December 1938, 'Wives Under Suspicion' emerged during a pivotal period in Hollywood history. The film industry was fully operating under the strict enforcement of the Production Code, which had been rigorously applied since 1934. This era saw studios remaking earlier, more provocative films to make them compliant with the Code's moral guidelines. 1938 was also a year of growing international tension, with the looming threat of World War II affecting American consciousness and cinema. The film's themes of suspicion, paranoia, and the breakdown of trust in personal relationships reflected the underlying anxiety of the period. Domestically, the Great Depression was still affecting many Americans, and films dealing with psychological tension and moral ambiguity provided an escape from economic hardships while also exploring the darker aspects of human nature that many viewers found compelling during uncertain times.

Making Of

James Whale approached this remake with mixed enthusiasm, as he had greater creative freedom on the 1933 original. The Production Code Administration required significant changes to the story, particularly regarding the treatment of marital infidelity and the psychological motivations of the characters. Warren William, who had built his career playing cynical, morally ambiguous men during the Pre-Code era, had to adjust his performance to fit the more restrictive 1938 standards while still maintaining the character's dark edge. The film was shot quickly on Universal's backlot, with Whale utilizing his signature expressionistic lighting techniques to create a sense of psychological tension despite the limited budget. The courtroom scenes were particularly challenging to film, as Whale wanted to maintain the claustrophobic pressure of the legal proceedings while keeping the visual interest high through creative camera angles and lighting. Gail Patrick and Warren William reportedly had a professional but cool relationship off-camera, which may have actually enhanced their on-screen tension as a couple experiencing marital strain.

Visual Style

The cinematography, credited to George Robinson, employs classic Universal style with notable expressionistic influences from James Whale's background. The film uses dramatic chiaroscuro lighting to create psychological tension, particularly in scenes where Warren William's character wrestles with his jealousy. Robinson utilizes low-angle shots in the courtroom sequences to emphasize the power dynamics and claustrophobic pressure of the legal proceedings. The domestic scenes feature more conventional lighting but still maintain a sense of unease through carefully composed shots that trap characters in doorways and shadows. Whale's influence is evident in the deliberate pacing of visual information and the use of mirrors and reflective surfaces to suggest the duality of the characters' natures. The black and white photography enhances the film's moral ambiguity, with no clear visual distinction between the 'good' and 'bad' characters.

Innovations

While not groundbreaking in its technical aspects, 'Wives Under Suspicion' demonstrates several notable achievements typical of Universal's efficient production system. The film's sound recording, handled by the studio's experienced technical team, achieves excellent clarity in the crucial courtroom dialogue scenes despite the challenging acoustics of the large set. The editing by Ted J. Kent effectively maintains the film's brisk 67-minute pace while allowing psychological moments to breathe. Universal's special effects department contributed subtle but effective optical effects for the mirror sequences, creating haunting visual metaphors for the characters' psychological states. The film's production design, though modest, makes clever use of existing Universal sets and props to create a convincing environment for the drama. Perhaps most significantly, the film represents a technical achievement in adapting Pre-Code themes to Production Code requirements without completely losing the story's psychological impact.

Music

The musical score was composed by Charles Previn, Universal's resident music director during this period. Previn's approach emphasizes the psychological tension of the story with subtle, understated themes that enhance rather than dominate the dramatic scenes. The score makes effective use of leitmotifs, particularly a recurring theme associated with Stephen de Lorca's growing paranoia that becomes more distorted as the film progresses. The courtroom scenes feature more traditional, dramatic orchestration, while the intimate domestic moments are scored with smaller, more chamber-like arrangements. Previn's work demonstrates the sophisticated approach to film music that was developing in the late 1930s, moving away from the wall-to-wall scoring of earlier films toward a more selective, psychologically motivated use of music. The soundtrack also makes effective use of diegetic music, particularly in scenes set in the couple's home, adding to the film's realistic texture.

Memorable Scenes

• The intense courtroom confrontation where Stephen de Lorca realizes he's prosecuting a man for a crime he's contemplating himself
• The psychological mirror sequence where Stephen imagines his wife's betrayal
• The climactic scene where Stephen must choose between his professional duty and personal jealousy
• The tense dinner scene where suspicion first poisons the marital relationship
• The final courtroom revelation that exposes the hypocrisy of the entire situation

What Critics Said

Contemporary critical reception was mixed to positive, with most reviewers acknowledging the film's tension and Warren William's compelling performance. The New York Times noted that while the story was familiar, Whale's direction and William's intensity elevated the material. Variety praised the film's pacing and psychological elements, though some critics felt the Production Code limitations weakened the impact compared to Whale's earlier version. Modern critics and film historians have reassessed the film more favorably, recognizing it as an important transitional work that bridges Pre-Code cynicism and later film noir. Many contemporary scholars appreciate Whale's ability to maintain psychological depth despite Code restrictions, and the film is often studied in courses examining Hollywood's adaptation to censorship. The film is now regarded as a minor but significant work in both Whale's filmography and the evolution of American psychological drama.

What Audiences Thought

Audience reception in 1938 was moderate, with the film performing adequately but not spectacularly at the box office. Warren William's fans appreciated his return to the type of morally ambiguous character that had made him famous during the Pre-Code era, though some found the toned-down version less compelling than his earlier work. The film's themes of marital suspicion resonated with adult audiences, particularly in an era when divorce was still taboo and marital problems were often kept private. Modern audiences who discover the film through film noir retrospectives or James Whale revivals generally respond positively to its psychological tension and atmospheric direction. The film has developed a cult following among classic film enthusiasts who appreciate its place in the evolution of American cinema and its connection to Whale's more famous works.

You Might Also Like