King John

Plot

This pioneering 1899 short film captures Act V, Scene vii of Shakespeare's King John, depicting the monarch's final moments of agony and torment. As King John writhes in delirious pain, he is attended by his son Prince Henry, the Earl of Pembroke, and Robert Bigot, who watch helplessly as the king's condition deteriorates. Prince Henry desperately attempts to comfort his suffering father, but John's pain overwhelms any solace offered. The scene culminates in the king's death, marking the tragic end of his troubled reign. This brief but powerful adaptation condenses Shakespeare's dramatic death scene into a mere few minutes of screen time, preserving one of Victorian theater's most renowned performances for posterity.

Historical Background

King John was produced during the nascent days of cinema, when moving pictures were still considered a technological novelty rather than an art form. 1899 was just four years after the first public film screenings by the Lumière brothers in Paris, and the film industry was still in its experimental phase. In Britain, cinema was primarily shown in music halls and fairgrounds as part of variety entertainment programs. The late Victorian era was a time of tremendous technological innovation, with inventions like the telephone, phonograph, and motion picture camera transforming popular culture. Theater remained the dominant form of dramatic entertainment, and most stage actors viewed film with suspicion, fearing it would diminish the live theatrical experience. This film represents an early attempt to bridge the gap between high culture (Shakespeare) and the new medium of cinema, at a time when most films consisted of simple actualities or brief comic sketches. The British Empire was at its zenith, and London was the cultural capital of the world, making it an appropriate setting for this pioneering adaptation of English literature's greatest playwright.

Making Of

The making of King John represents a pivotal moment in early cinema history, marking one of the first collaborations between legitimate theater and the fledgling film industry. Herbert Beerbohm Tree, initially skeptical of the new medium, was persuaded to allow filming of his acclaimed death scene from the Shakespeare production. The British Mutoscope and Biograph Company sent technicians to capture the performance using their innovative 68mm camera system, which produced remarkably detailed images. The filming process was rudimentary by modern standards - a stationary camera positioned to capture the stage action, with the actors performing essentially as they would for a live audience. Tree's elaborate death scene, complete with writhing, moaning, and dramatic gestures, was perfectly suited to the silent medium and required no adaptation for the camera. The production team worked quickly, as the bulky Biograph camera could only hold short amounts of film stock. This brief filming session represented a significant investment of time and resources for 1899, as it involved coordinating with one of London's most prominent theatrical figures and disrupting regular theater operations.

Visual Style

The cinematography of King John reflects the primitive state of film technology in 1899, utilizing a single static camera positioned to capture the stage performance. The film was shot using the Biograph company's 68mm film format, which produced an unusually large and detailed image for the period, with a resolution comparable to modern high-definition video. This large format allowed for remarkable clarity in capturing facial expressions and costume details, though the camera remained fixed throughout the scene. The lighting would have been theatrical rather than cinematic, designed for stage visibility rather than photographic effect. No camera movement was employed, as the technology for panning or tracking shots had not yet been developed. The frame composition was essentially theatrical, with the performers arranged as they would be on stage rather than being positioned for optimal camera angles. Despite these limitations, the large format and careful lighting resulted in a remarkably clear and detailed image that has preserved Tree's performance with surprising fidelity.

Innovations

King John represents several important technical achievements for its time, most notably its use of the 68mm Biograph format, which produced images of exceptional clarity and detail. The film's preservation of a complete dramatic scene, rather than the brief snippets typical of 1899, was technically ambitious. The ability to capture Tree's elaborate performance with sufficient detail to be recognizable was a significant accomplishment. The film demonstrated early cinema's capacity to document theatrical performance, creating a permanent record of a transient art form. The successful synchronization of the camera's hand-cranking with the actors' performance timing was technically challenging for the period. The film's survival and preservation over more than a century is itself a testament to the quality of the original materials and the care taken in its storage. The Biograph camera used for this film was capable of shooting at 30 frames per second, much faster than contemporary cameras, resulting in smoother motion that better captured theatrical performance.

Music

As a silent film from 1899, King John had no synchronized soundtrack. During its original exhibition, the film would have been accompanied by live musical performance, typically a pianist or small ensemble playing appropriate dramatic music. The musical accompaniment would have been improvised or selected from standard theatrical repertoire of the era, likely consisting of dramatic, somber pieces to match the death scene's mood. Some exhibitors might have used popular classical pieces known to evoke tragedy or pathos. In modern presentations, the film is sometimes accompanied by newly composed scores or period-appropriate music. The lack of recorded dialogue meant that Tree's performance relied entirely on physical expression and gesture, making it particularly suited to the silent medium. Contemporary audiences would have been familiar with the story of King John and would have understood the context without needing intertitles or dialogue.

Memorable Scenes

• King John's death scene - the entire film consists of this powerful moment where the tormented monarch writhes in agony while his son and nobles watch helplessly, with Tree's highly physical performance conveying intense suffering through gesture and expression alone.

What Critics Said

Contemporary critical reception of King John is difficult to trace due to the limited film journalism of 1899, but surviving accounts suggest it was regarded as a technological marvel rather than an artistic achievement. The Times and other major newspapers covered the filming as a news event, focusing on the novelty of capturing Tree's famous performance. Theater critics of the era were generally dismissive of cinema, viewing it as inferior to live performance. Modern film historians and critics recognize King John as a landmark work primarily for its historical importance rather than its artistic merits. The film is praised for preserving Tree's performance style and for its pioneering role in cinema history, though criticized by some for its static camera work and theatrical rather than cinematic approach. Today, scholars view it as an invaluable document of Victorian theatrical performance and a crucial link between stage and screen traditions.

What Audiences Thought

Audience reception in 1899 was likely one of fascination and curiosity, as most viewers had never seen a moving image of a famous theatrical performer. Contemporary accounts suggest that audiences were particularly drawn to the opportunity to see Herbert Beerbohm Tree, whose stage performances were typically accessible only to London theatergoers. The film's novelty value was significant - seeing a death scene, even a simulated one, on screen was a powerful experience for early cinema audiences. The short length and dramatic content made it ideal for variety programs, where it could serve as a climactic attraction. Modern audiences viewing the film today often express surprise at its theatricality and the intensity of Tree's performance, which contrasts with more naturalistic acting styles that would later dominate cinema. The film remains of interest primarily to film historians, Shakespeare scholars, and cinema enthusiasts rather than general audiences, due to its historical significance and brevity.

You Might Also Like