Hamlet

Plot

This groundbreaking 1921 adaptation presents Hamlet as a woman disguised as a man by her mother Queen Gertrude to secure the Danish throne succession. When King Hamlet is murdered by his treacherous brother Claudius, who then marries Gertrude, the young 'prince' returns from Wittenberg to discover through her father's ghost that Claudius committed the murder using a venomous snake. Hamlet feigns madness to investigate the crime while navigating complex feelings for Horatio and struggling with her dual identity. The film follows the familiar tragic arc with the play-within-a-play that exposes Claudius's guilt, but adds psychological depth through Hamlet's secret gender and the performance required to maintain her disguise. The tragedy culminates in the deaths of most principal characters, with Hamlet's internal struggles compounded by the weight of her hidden identity and the roles forced upon her by gender and royal expectations.

Historical Background

This film was produced in 1921 during the early Weimar Republic period, a time of tremendous artistic innovation despite economic turmoil following World War I. Germany was experiencing what would later be recognized as a golden age of cinema, with films like 'The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari' (1920) revolutionizing visual storytelling. The 1920s saw significant social changes including new discussions about women's roles in society, with women having gained the right to vote in Germany in 1918. This cultural atmosphere of experimentation and questioning traditional values made audiences receptive to radical reinterpretations of classic works. The film's international co-production nature reflected the increasingly global nature of cinema in the 1920s, with stars like Nielsen achieving fame across national boundaries. The post-war period also saw a flourishing of psychological theory and interest in the inner workings of the human mind, which influenced the film's focus on Hamlet's psychological complexity. Additionally, the film emerged during a period when cinema was establishing itself as a serious art form capable of literary adaptation and artistic expression.

Making Of

The production of this unique Hamlet was driven largely by Asta Nielsen's artistic vision and her unprecedented control over her projects. As one of Europe's biggest film stars, Nielsen had formed her own production company and could choose projects that interested her artistically. She worked closely with Danish director Svend Gade to develop this radical interpretation, which was based on both scholarly theory and Nielsen's desire to explore complex psychological roles. The filming took place during the height of German Expressionism, though the film opted for more realistic visual style to better serve the character study. The casting created interesting dynamics - Heinz Stieda as Horatio had to portray a relationship that takes on different dimensions with the gender reveal. The production team faced challenges in creating costumes that would read as masculine on screen while allowing Nielsen to express the character's feminine nature. The film's elaborate palace sets were constructed at Berlin's Decla studios, requiring significant resources and attention to historical detail. Nielsen was deeply involved in every aspect of production, from script development to costume design, making this truly her artistic statement.

Visual Style

The cinematography by Ragnar Ring and Karl Freund demonstrates the growing sophistication of visual storytelling in silent cinema. While not as avant-garde as contemporary Expressionist works, the film employs dramatic lighting techniques to emphasize psychological states, particularly in Hamlet's soliloquies. The camera work includes innovative angles and movements for the period, using deep focus to create depth in palace interiors. The cinematography effectively uses shadow and light to reinforce themes of deception and hidden truths. Close-ups are used strategically, particularly on Nielsen's face, to convey the complex emotions of a character living with a secret identity. The visual style balances realism with theatricality, appropriate for literary adaptation while embracing cinematic possibilities. The Danish court settings are rendered with visual richness, using architectural elements to create a sense of both grandeur and confinement that mirrors Hamlet's psychological state.

Innovations

While not as technically innovative as some contemporary German films, Hamlet demonstrated several notable achievements for 1921. The production design created convincing 16th-century Danish court settings requiring substantial resources and historical accuracy. Costume design was significant, needing to suggest masculinity while accommodating the gender reveal. Makeup techniques were advanced for the period, effectively creating Nielsen's transformation without appearing artificial. The intertitles were thoughtfully crafted to convey Shakespearean dialogue and additional exposition for the gender-bending premise. Editing techniques effectively paced the complex narrative and maintained dramatic tension throughout the substantial runtime. The film's survival in multiple reels demonstrates relatively advanced film stock and processing techniques available in Germany. The production also achieved technical sophistication in its lighting design, using chiaroscuro effects to enhance psychological drama without fully adopting Expressionist style.

Music

As a silent film, Hamlet would have been accompanied by live musical performance during theatrical runs. The specific scores used are not well documented, but theaters likely used classical pieces or specially composed music reflecting the dramatic tone. German theaters probably featured composers like Wagner or other romantic composers. Some cinemas used existing classical pieces matching different scenes' moods, while larger venues had original scores composed specifically for the film. The music was crucial in conveying emotional content and dramatic tension, particularly in scenes showing Hamlet's internal conflict. Modern screenings typically feature newly composed scores attempting to capture the spirit of the era while enhancing contemporary viewing experience. The musical accompaniment would have been particularly important in scenes where Hamlet's gender identity creates psychological tension beneath the surface of the action.

Memorable Scenes

• The opening sequence establishing Hamlet's upbringing as a boy, setting up the film's unique premise
• The ghost scene where Hamlet learns of her father's murder, taking on added weight with the gender reveal
• The play-within-a-play scene where Hamlet uses theatrical performance to expose truth while living a performance herself
• The confrontation between Hamlet and Gertrude where the mother-daughter relationship is hidden beneath their public roles
• The scene where Hamlet's interactions with Horatio reveal romantic tension complicated by the gender secret
• The final tragic scenes where the various characters meet their demise, particularly poignant with Hamlet's hidden identity revealed
• The 'To be or not to be' soliloquy, rendered through intertitles and Nielsen's expressive performance with added existential dimension from the gender conflict

What Critics Said

Contemporary critical reception was largely positive, with particular praise for Nielsen's bold performance and the film's artistic courage. German film publications like Film-Kurier praised the production values and Nielsen's nuanced portrayal of the conflicted 'prince.' International critics noted how the film demonstrated cinema's potential beyond mere entertainment. Some traditional Shakespeare purists expressed skepticism but many acknowledged the artistic merit of the execution. The London Times called it 'a daring and successful experiment in cinematic art.' French critics praised how the adaptation added new psychological dimensions to the familiar tragedy. Modern film historians have come to view this adaptation as a groundbreaking achievement, with scholars like Lotte Eisner citing it as an example of German cinema's artistic sophistication. The film is now recognized as anticipating later developments in gender theory and film studies, with contemporary critics often expressing surprise at how progressive the themes feel for 1921.

What Audiences Thought

Audience reception was generally enthusiastic, particularly among Asta Nielsen's substantial international fan base. The film performed well in major European markets, with extended runs in Berlin and Copenhagen. Contemporary viewers were intrigued by the gender-bending premise, which added mystery and psychological complexity to the familiar story. Some audience members were initially confused by the gender element, but most found it enhanced the character study. The film's success helped cement Nielsen's status as one of Europe's biggest stars and demonstrated that sophisticated audiences would support ambitious artistic projects. American audiences, when the film was imported in 1922, were particularly fascinated by the European approach to literary adaptation. Modern audiences who have seen restored versions often express admiration for how the film handles complex themes with subtlety and psychological depth. The film has developed a cult following among silent film enthusiasts and those interested in early examples of gender-bending cinema.

You Might Also Like