
"A Sun-Play of the Ages: A Dramatic Spectacle of Love and Intolerance Through the Centuries"
D.W. Griffith's ambitious epic interweaves four parallel stories from different historical periods, all demonstrating humanity's struggle against intolerance. In modern America (1914), a poor young couple (The Dear One and The Boy) are torn apart by social reformers and false accusations, leading to tragedy. Ancient Babylon (539 BC) shows the fall of the great city to Persian invaders amid religious conflict between Prince Belshazzar and the rival High Priest. Judea (27 AD) depicts the Pharisees' intolerance toward Jesus Christ and his followers, culminating in the crucifixion. The French Renaissance (1572) portrays the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre, where Catholic persecution of Huguenots destroys the romance between Brown Eyes and Prosper Latour. These stories are connected through the recurring motif of a mother rocking a cradle, symbolizing the eternal struggle between love and hatred throughout human history.
The production spanned over two years (1914-1916) with massive sets including the 300-foot-high Babylonian wall. Griffith employed thousands of extras and pioneered techniques like parallel editing, crane shots, and deep focus. The film's unprecedented scale required multiple camera crews working simultaneously on different storylines. Griffith mortgaged his home to finance portions of the production after studio support waned.
Released during World War I, 'Intolerance' reflected the global turmoil and social upheaval of its time. The film emerged during the Progressive Era in America, a period of social reform and moral crusades that Griffith critiqued through the modern storyline. The early 1910s saw massive immigration to America, rising labor movements, and women's suffrage campaigns, all contributing to social tensions. The film's creation was directly influenced by the controversy surrounding 'The Birth of a Nation' and the growing civil rights movement. Internationally, the world was witnessing unprecedented destruction during WWI, making Griffith's message about the destructive nature of intolerance particularly resonant. The film also coincided with the early days of Hollywood's transformation into the global film capital.
'Intolerance' revolutionized cinematic language through its pioneering use of cross-cutting between different time periods, establishing techniques that would become fundamental to film editing. Its ambitious scale set new standards for film production, proving that cinema could handle complex, epic narratives comparable to literature or opera. The film influenced countless directors including Sergei Eisenstein, who praised its editing techniques, and modern filmmakers like Francis Ford Coppola and Martin Scorsese. Its visual innovations influenced the development of film grammar, particularly in how time and space could be manipulated through editing. The film stands as a landmark of cinematic artistry, demonstrating that silent film could convey complex themes and emotions without dialogue. Its message about prejudice and intolerance remains relevant, with the film still being studied and referenced in discussions about social justice and media representation.
The making of 'Intolerance' was one of the most ambitious and challenging productions of early cinema. Griffith worked with multiple cinematographers including G.W. Bitzer and Billy Bitzer, developing new techniques for large-scale scenes. The Babylonian set, designed by Walter L. Hall, was the largest film set ever constructed at that time, featuring massive walls and intricate details. Production was chaotic with Griffith often directing multiple scenes simultaneously across different sets. The famous battle sequence required careful choreography of thousands of extras, horses, and chariots. Many cast and crew members suffered injuries during the demanding production. Griffith's perfectionism led to constant reshoots and improvisation, often changing scenes based on his daily inspirations. The film's complex editing required months of work to properly interweave the four storylines.
The cinematography, primarily by G.W. Bitzer and Billy Bitzer, was groundbreaking for its time. The film featured innovative camera movements including the famous crane shot descending from the Babylonian walls, one of the first uses of a camera crane in cinema. The cinematographers employed deep focus techniques to capture massive sets with thousands of extras in sharp detail. They developed new lighting techniques to create dramatic shadows and highlights, particularly in the modern story sequences. The battle scenes featured dynamic tracking shots and multiple camera angles to capture the scale of the action. The visual style varied between the four stories, with each period receiving distinct photographic treatment - Babylon was grand and spectacular, Judea was stark and spiritual, Renaissance France was rich and textured, and modern America was gritty and realistic. The film's visual language established conventions that would influence cinematography for decades.
'Intolerance' pioneered numerous technical innovations that would become standard in filmmaking. The film's parallel editing between four different time periods was revolutionary, establishing cross-cutting as a fundamental cinematic technique. The production featured the first use of a camera crane for the dramatic descending shot in Babylon. Griffith developed techniques for managing thousands of extras in complex battle sequences, including detailed storyboards and rehearsal systems. The film's massive sets required new construction techniques and engineering innovations. The editing process, which took months, involved synchronizing four different storylines with different pacing and visual styles. The production also experimented with color tinting, using different color schemes for each time period. The film's length required new projection technology and theater accommodations. These technical achievements pushed the boundaries of what was possible in cinema and established many conventions still used in filmmaking today.
The original score was composed by Joseph Carl Breil, who had also scored 'The Birth of a Nation.' The music was designed to enhance the emotional impact of each storyline while providing continuity between the different time periods. Breil incorporated classical themes and original compositions, using leitmotifs to connect characters and themes across the four stories. The score was performed live in theaters by orchestras during initial screenings, with cue sheets provided to synchronize the music with the action. Modern restorations have featured newly composed scores by contemporary composers including Carl Davis and the Mont Alto Motion Picture Orchestra. The music plays a crucial role in unifying the film's complex structure, with recurring themes helping audiences follow the parallel narratives. The soundtrack's emotional power compensates for the lack of dialogue, with the music conveying the film's themes of love, suffering, and redemption.
The story of a dear one... and a boy... and the love that would not die.
Out of the cradle, endlessly rocking.
When women cease to attract men, they will turn to spiritualism and spiritualism will become a fad.
The little girl who was dear to us all, whose heart was as pure as the morning dew.
In each age, the same story repeats itself: love struggling against intolerance.
The boy was a good boy. He had his faults, but he was good at heart.
Contemporary critical reception was mixed to positive, with many critics acknowledging the film's technical brilliance while questioning its narrative complexity. The New York Times praised its 'magnificent spectacle' but found the intercutting confusing. Variety called it 'the greatest picture ever made' despite its commercial failure. Modern critics universally acclaim it as a masterpiece; Roger Ebert included it in his Great Movies collection, calling it 'perhaps the most ambitious film ever made.' Sight & Sound ranked it among the greatest films of all time in multiple polls. Film scholars consider it a crucial text in understanding the development of cinematic language, with particular praise for its editing innovations and visual storytelling. The film's reputation has grown significantly over time, with many now considering it superior to 'The Birth of a Nation' in both artistic merit and social consciousness.
Initial audience reception was disappointing, with many viewers finding the film's complex narrative structure confusing and its length excessive. The film's commercial failure shocked the industry, given Griffith's previous success with 'The Birth of a Nation.' Contemporary audiences were divided, with some praising its spectacle while others criticized its perceived moralizing. Over time, audience appreciation has grown significantly, particularly among film enthusiasts and scholars. Modern audiences often find the film surprisingly accessible despite its age, thanks to its visual storytelling and emotional power. The film has developed a cult following among cinema lovers and is frequently screened at film festivals and repertory theaters. Its restoration and availability on home video have introduced it to new generations, who often express amazement at its technical achievements and emotional impact.
The film has been preserved by the Museum of Modern Art and the Library of Congress. Multiple versions exist due to Griffith's re-editing over the years. The most complete restoration was undertaken by Kevin Brownlow and David Gill in the 1980s, combining footage from various archives worldwide. The film was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry in 1989 for its cultural, historical, and aesthetic significance. Digital restorations have been completed, with the most recent being a 4K restoration by Cohen Film Collection. Some footage remains lost, particularly from the modern story sequences, but the film survives in a remarkably complete state considering its age.