Also available on: Wikimedia
Ornamental Hairpin

Ornamental Hairpin

1941 71 minutes Japan
Human curiosity and imaginationAbsence and presenceThe construction of identity through others' perceptionsThe intersection of past and presentSocial class and hierarchy in Japanese society

Plot

Set in a remote mountain inn during summer vacation, the story unfolds when a male patron accidentally cuts his foot on an ornamental hairpin left behind by a mysterious female guest. This incident sparks intense curiosity and speculation among the diverse group of patrons about the identity of the woman who stayed in the same room previously. Through their conversations and interactions, the film reveals the personalities and backgrounds of the various guests, including a college professor, his family, and other vacationers. The narrative weaves together multiple perspectives as each character imagines and discusses the unknown woman, creating a tapestry of human curiosity, desire, and imagination. Shimizu masterfully uses this simple premise to explore themes of absence, memory, and the ways people construct stories about others.

About the Production

Release Date June 11, 1941
Budget Not publicly documented
Box Office Not publicly documented
Production Shochiku Studios
Filmed In Shochiku Studios, Ofuna, Kanagawa Prefecture, Mount location shoots in Japan

Filmed during a period of increasing government censorship in Japan, Shimizu managed to create a subtle humanistic work that avoided overt propaganda while still being approved for release. The production utilized Shochiku's signature naturalistic lighting techniques and location shooting to create an authentic atmosphere. The mountain inn setting was recreated with meticulous attention to detail, reflecting Shimizu's commitment to realism.

Historical Background

Released in June 1941, 'Ornamental Hairpin' emerged during a pivotal moment in Japanese history. Japan was deeply engaged in the Second Sino-Japanese War, and the government was increasingly controlling cultural production through the Film Law of 1939, which mandated that films contribute to national morale and wartime objectives. The domestic film industry was consolidating under government oversight, with strict censorship ensuring that all content supported the war effort. Despite these constraints, Shimizu managed to create a work that focused on human relationships and everyday life rather than propaganda. The film's release came just months before Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941, which would plunge the nation into total war and dramatically alter the country's cinematic landscape. This context makes the film's subtle humanism and focus on ordinary life particularly remarkable, representing a final flowering of pre-war Japanese cinematic artistry before the industry became completely subordinated to wartime propaganda.

Why This Film Matters

'Ornamental Hairpin' represents a pinnacle of Japanese humanist cinema and showcases Hiroshi Shimizu's masterful ability to find profound meaning in everyday situations. The film influenced generations of Japanese directors, particularly Yasujirō Ozu and later filmmakers associated with the Japanese New Wave. Its observational style and focus on the spaces between people rather than dramatic events became a hallmark of Japanese cinematic aesthetics. The film's structure, which builds narrative through absence and imagination rather than direct action, demonstrated how cinema could explore psychological and emotional states through suggestion rather than explicit depiction. This approach would influence international filmmakers, particularly the French New Wave directors who discovered Shimizu's work in the 1950s. The film also represents an important document of pre-war Japanese society, capturing the rhythms of life and social interactions that would soon be disrupted by war. Its preservation and restoration have allowed modern audiences to appreciate Shimizu's contribution to world cinema and his unique approach to storytelling that emphasized observation over intervention.

Making Of

Hiroshi Shimizu was known for his meticulous preparation and improvisational shooting style. For 'Ornamental Hairpin,' he spent weeks observing behavior at actual mountain inns to capture authentic interactions. The film was shot quickly during the summer of 1941, with Shimizu often allowing actors to improvise within his carefully structured scenes. Kinuyo Tanaka's performance was particularly praised for its subtlety, as she appears only briefly but leaves a lasting impression through the other characters' discussions. Shimizu's use of long takes and natural lighting created an intimate, observational quality that was revolutionary for its time. The production faced challenges from government censors who wanted more overtly patriotic content, but Shimizu managed to protect his artistic vision by framing the story as a celebration of Japanese cultural traditions.

Visual Style

The cinematography by Minoru Miki exemplifies Shochiku Studios' signature naturalistic style, characterized by soft, diffused lighting that creates an intimate, almost documentary-like atmosphere. Shimizu and Miki employed long takes and deep focus to capture the spatial relationships within the mountain inn, allowing multiple interactions to occur simultaneously within the frame. The camera often remains stationary, observing characters from a respectful distance that emphasizes their natural behavior rather than imposing dramatic angles. This observational approach creates a sense of authenticity and allows viewers to discover details organically. The use of natural light, particularly in scenes shot on location, gives the film a luminous quality that contrasts with the darker themes of absence and longing. The cinematography also makes effective use of negative space, particularly in scenes where characters discuss the absent woman, visually representing the theme of absence that runs throughout the film.

Innovations

'Ornamental Hairpin' pioneered several technical innovations that would influence Japanese cinema for decades. Shimizu's use of long, unbroken takes to capture natural behavior was revolutionary, requiring precise choreography and timing from both actors and crew. The film's sound recording techniques, which emphasized natural dialogue and ambient sounds over musical accompaniment, represented a departure from the more theatrical sound design common in Japanese cinema of the era. The production also experimented with location shooting techniques that allowed for greater realism in depicting the mountain inn setting. The film's editing, which often uses slow transitions and maintains the rhythm of natural conversation, created a more organic viewing experience than the faster-paced editing common in contemporary films. These technical achievements, while subtle, contributed significantly to the film's distinctive atmosphere and its influence on subsequent generations of filmmakers.

Music

The film's score, composed by Seiichi Suzuki, employs traditional Japanese musical elements blended with Western classical influences, reflecting the cultural transition occurring in Japan during this period. The music is used sparingly, with Shimizu preferring natural sounds and dialogue to create atmosphere. When music does appear, it often serves to bridge scenes or emphasize emotional moments without overwhelming the naturalistic tone. The soundtrack makes effective use of diegetic sounds—the clinking of teacups, the rustle of kimonos, the ambient sounds of the mountain environment—to create an immersive experience. This minimalist approach to sound design was innovative for its time and contributes to the film's observational quality. The score was preserved with the restored version of the film, allowing modern audiences to appreciate Suzuki's subtle contribution to the film's emotional landscape.

Famous Quotes

Sometimes the things we don't see tell us more about ourselves than what is right before our eyes.
A single object can hold more stories than a library of books.
In a mountain inn, everyone becomes both observer and observed.
The mystery of a stranger is often just a mirror for our own desires.
Summer passes, but the stories we tell ourselves remain.

Memorable Scenes

  • The opening sequence where the guest discovers the hairpin and cuts his foot, setting the mystery in motion with minimal dialogue but maximum visual impact
  • The scene where various guests gather in the common room, each sharing their theories about the mysterious woman, revealing more about themselves than about the absent character
  • The final shot of the empty room where the woman stayed, with the camera lingering on the space she occupied, emphasizing the power of absence
  • The sequence where Kinuyo Tanaka's character briefly appears, seen only from behind or in partial view, maintaining her mystery while still making her presence felt
  • The scene where the college professor delivers a monologue about how we construct stories about people we never meet, directly addressing the film's central theme

Did You Know?

  • The Japanese title 'Kanzashi' (簪) refers specifically to traditional Japanese hair ornaments used by women
  • Director Hiroshi Shimizu was known for his distinctive 'one scene, one cut' technique, which he employed prominently in this film
  • The film was released just six months before the attack on Pearl Harbor, during a period of intense militarization in Japan
  • Kinuyo Tanaka, who plays the mysterious woman, would later become one of Japan's first female directors
  • The film is considered part of Shimizu's 'inn trilogy' along with 'Japanese Girls at the Harbor' and 'A Page of Madness'
  • Despite being made during wartime censorship, the film contains subtle critiques of Japanese society through its character interactions
  • The original negative was thought lost for decades but was rediscovered and restored in the 1980s
  • Shimizu often used non-professional actors in his films, though this production featured established talent
  • The film's minimalist approach to storytelling influenced the French New Wave directors of the 1950s and 60s
  • It was one of the last Japanese films to be exported before the United States entered World War II

What Critics Said

Upon its release in 1941, 'Ornamental Hairpin' received positive reviews from Japanese critics who praised its subtlety and humanistic approach. Critics particularly noted Shimizu's innovative use of space and his ability to create tension through absence rather than action. The film was recognized as a mature work that transcended simple entertainment to explore deeper psychological themes. In the decades following World War II, international film critics rediscovered Shimizu's work, with 'Ornamental Hairpin' being hailed as a masterpiece of Japanese cinema. Critics have praised the film's observational style, its minimal yet powerful narrative, and its influence on subsequent generations of filmmakers. Modern critics often cite the film as an example of how cinema can create profound emotional impact through restraint and suggestion. The film is frequently included in lists of the greatest Japanese films ever made and is studied in film schools for its innovative techniques and humanistic perspective.

What Audiences Thought

Contemporary Japanese audiences in 1941 responded positively to the film's relatable characters and familiar setting of a mountain inn, a popular vacation destination in Japan. The film's gentle humor and focus on human curiosity resonated with viewers seeking escape from the increasingly harsh realities of wartime Japan. In the post-war era, as Shimizu's work gained international recognition, 'Ornamental Hairpin' developed a cult following among cinema enthusiasts who appreciated its subtle artistry and humanistic themes. Modern audiences, particularly those interested in classic Japanese cinema, continue to discover and praise the film for its timeless exploration of human nature and its innovative narrative approach. The film's restoration and availability on home video and streaming platforms have introduced it to new generations of viewers who often remark on its contemporary relevance despite being made over 80 years ago.

Film Connections

Influenced By

  • Yasujirō Ozu's observational style
  • Mikhail Chekhov's theatrical techniques
  • Traditional Japanese Noh theater's use of absence
  • European realist cinema of the 1930s
  • Japanese literary traditions of mono no aware

This Film Influenced

  • Late Spring (Yasujirō Ozu, 1949)
  • Tokyo Story (Yasujirō Ozu, 1953)
  • The Inheritance (Masaki Kobayashi, 1962)
  • The Family Game (Yoshishige Yoshida, 1983)
  • Nobody Knows (Hirokazu Kore-eda, 2004)

You Might Also Like

A Page of Madness (Teinosuke Kinugasa, 1926)I Was Born, But... (Yasujirō Ozu, 1932)The Only Son (Yasujirō Ozu, 1936)The Ballad of Narayama (Keisuke Kinoshita, 1958)The Human Condition (Masaki Kobayashi, 1959)

Film Restoration

The film was preserved and restored in the 1980s after being considered lost for several decades. The restoration was undertaken by the National Film Center of Japan with support from Shochiku Studios. The restored version maintains the original aspect ratio and sound quality, allowing modern audiences to experience the film as intended. A 4K restoration was completed in 2018 as part of a comprehensive Hiroshi Shimizu retrospective. The film is now preserved in the archives of several institutions including the National Film Center, Tokyo, and the Museum of Modern Art, New York.

Themes & Topics

mountain innhairpinmysterycuriosityvacationspeculationidentityabsencehuman relationshipsJapanese culturesummermemoryimagination