Ivan the Terrible, Part I

Plot

The film chronicles the early reign of Ivan IV of Russia, beginning with his coronation as Tsar at age 16. Ivan marries Anastasia Romanovna and attempts to consolidate power against the powerful boyar aristocracy who resist his centralizing reforms. When Ivan falls ill, the boyars plot against him, leading to his growing paranoia and determination to establish absolute authority. The film depicts key historical events including the conquest of Kazan and Ivan's transformation from a young idealist into the formidable ruler known as Ivan the Terrible, setting the stage for his increasingly autocratic rule.

Historical Background

The film was produced during the height of World War II, when the Soviet Union was fighting for its survival against Nazi Germany. Stalin saw parallels between Ivan's struggle to unite Russia against external threats and the Soviet Union's current situation. The film served as powerful propaganda, presenting historical justification for strong, centralized leadership during crisis. Eisenstein, who had previously been criticized for formalist tendencies, carefully balanced artistic innovation with political acceptability. The production began in 1943 when the tide of the war was turning in favor of the Allies, and the film's release in early 1944 coincided with major Soviet victories. The choice to glorify a historical figure known for his ruthlessness reflected Stalin's own leadership style and provided historical precedent for his authoritarian rule.

Making Of

The making of Ivan the Terrible Part I was fraught with challenges and political intrigue. Eisenstein, who had fallen out of favor with Soviet authorities in the 1930s, saw this project as his chance for redemption. He worked closely with historian Nikolai Kostomarov's research to ensure historical accuracy, while also incorporating his own artistic vision. The production team created over 3,000 period costumes and built massive sets representing 16th-century Russian architecture. Eisenstein experimented with innovative camera techniques, including complex tracking shots and dramatic lighting effects that would become hallmarks of his style. The relationship between Eisenstein and his lead actor Cherkasov was particularly collaborative, with the two spending hours discussing Ivan's psychology and motivations. Despite wartime shortages, the Soviet government allocated significant resources to the production, recognizing its propaganda value in presenting a strong Russian leader during the nation's darkest hours.

Visual Style

The cinematography, primarily by Andrei Moskvin and Eduard Tisse, represents some of the most innovative camera work of its era. Eisenstein employed dramatic low-angle shots to emphasize Ivan's power, and used elaborate lighting schemes to create psychological depth. The film features complex compositions with multiple planes of action, influenced by Eisenstein's theories of montage. The coronation sequence uses sweeping camera movements and architectural framing to create epic scale. Black and white photography is used with remarkable contrast, creating stark, expressionistic images that emphasize the moral ambiguity of Ivan's character. The film's visual style blends historical authenticity with modernist abstraction, creating a unique aesthetic that influenced countless later historical films.

Innovations

The film pioneered numerous technical innovations that would influence cinema for decades. Eisenstein developed new techniques for creating period authenticity while maintaining artistic expression. The makeup effects, particularly the aging of Ivan, were groundbreaking for their time. The film's sound recording was innovative for its use of music and effects to create psychological atmosphere. The production design created some of the most elaborate historical sets ever built, with attention to architectural detail that set new standards. The film's editing, while maintaining Eisenstein's montage theory, evolved toward a more seamless narrative flow. The cinematography pushed the boundaries of what was possible with black and white film, creating images of remarkable depth and complexity. These technical achievements were accomplished despite wartime shortages and primitive equipment by modern standards.

Music

The score by Sergei Prokofiev is considered one of the greatest film compositions ever written. Prokofiev worked closely with Eisenstein, creating music that both supports the narrative and provides independent commentary. The soundtrack incorporates Russian folk melodies, Orthodox liturgical music, and modernist orchestration to create a rich tapestry of sound. Key themes are associated with specific characters and ideas, with Ivan's theme evolving throughout the film to reflect his changing psychological state. The music for the coronation scene is particularly grand, using full orchestra and chorus to create ceremonial splendor. Prokofiev's innovative use of leitmotifs and his ability to convey complex emotions through orchestration set new standards for film music. The score was later adapted into a concert suite that remains popular in classical music repertoire.

Memorable Scenes

• The coronation sequence: A spectacular scene with thousands of extras in elaborate costumes, filmed with sweeping camera movements and dramatic lighting, establishing Ivan's divine right to rule
• Ivan's deathbed scene: A powerful sequence where the young Tsar appears to be dying, leading the boyars to reveal their true loyalties before Ivan miraculously recovers
• The conquest of Kazan: An extended battle sequence demonstrating Eisenstein's mastery of large-scale action choreography and montage
• The wedding scene: Combines intimate character moments with grand ceremonial spectacle, showing both the personal and political aspects of Ivan's marriage to Anastasia
• The boyars' conspiracy scene: A tense sequence of cross-cutting between various nobles plotting against Ivan, building paranoia and suspense

What Critics Said

Initial Soviet reception was overwhelmingly positive, with Pravda praising it as 'a triumph of Soviet art.' Critics particularly lauded Cherkasov's performance and Eisenstein's visual mastery. International critics were equally impressed, with The New York Times calling it 'one of the most magnificent historical films ever produced.' Western film journals praised its technical innovation and artistic ambition. However, after Stalin's death and the release of Part II, critics reevaluated Part I, noting its subtle critiques of absolute power. Modern critics consider the film a masterpiece of world cinema, with particular appreciation for its complex visual symbolism and psychological depth. The film consistently appears on lists of greatest films ever made, including Sight & Sound's critics' poll.

What Audiences Thought

Soviet audiences responded enthusiastically to the film during its initial release, seeing it as both entertainment and patriotic inspiration during wartime. The character of Ivan resonated with viewers as a symbol of Russian strength and determination. The film was screened widely across the USSR, including in factories and military units. After the war, it continued to be popular, though its reception became more complex as audiences became aware of its political undertones. International audiences were initially limited due to Cold War restrictions, but where it was shown, it impressed viewers with its scale and artistry. Modern audiences often find the film challenging but rewarding, with its stylized performances and complex narrative structure requiring close attention.

You Might Also Like